These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9293498)
61. [Quality assurance in operative medicine--a part of the clinical research]. Gastinger I Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Oct; 130(5):385-6. PubMed ID: 16220431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. The Quality of Practice Committee of the RCPCH. McIntosh N; Baumer JH Arch Dis Child; 2005 Sep; 90(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 16113126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Introduction, audit and review of guidelines for delegated authorization of nuclear medicine investigations in compliance with the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000. Harris AM; Greaves CD; Taylor CM; Taylor C; Segasby CA; Tindale WB Nucl Med Commun; 2003 Aug; 24(8):939-42. PubMed ID: 12869828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Certification in nuclear cardiology in Europe. Bengel FM Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Feb; 32(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 15660257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. NMTCB directions. Merlino D J Nucl Med Technol; 1997 Mar; 25(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 9239610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Comparisons of activity measurements with radionuclide calibrators-A tool for quality assessment and improvement in nuclear medicine. Oropesa P; Hernández AT; Serra R; Varela C Appl Radiat Isot; 2005 Oct; 63(4):493-503. PubMed ID: 16039865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Professional conduct: is self-regulation the answer? Vet Rec; 1998 Oct; 143(17):459-60. PubMed ID: 9829300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. The AAPM should develop protocols generically, and avoid documents that are too strict and prescriptive, to facilitate their adoption by regulatory agencies like the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and States. Jones CG; Thomadsen B Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):431-3. PubMed ID: 10757592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Performance and responsibility guidelines for the nuclear medicine technologist (revision 2003). ; J Nucl Med Technol; 2003 Dec; 31(4):222-9. PubMed ID: 14657289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Nuclear medicine: guidelines for the provision of a clinical service. Report of a Working Group of the Royal College of Physicians Nuclear Medicine Committee. J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1997; 31(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 9263965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Components of preparedness statements to accompany 2003 task analysis. Prekeges JL J Nucl Med Technol; 2005 Mar; 33(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 15731022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. [Federal recommendation and its application to the area of hospital insurance]. Schumacher G Radiologe; 1997 Apr; 37(4):M55-6. PubMed ID: 9265204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. National audit of the quality of the clinical blood transfusion process. New audit measures for good practice in blood transfusion medicine. Hartigan G J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1996; 30(1):36. PubMed ID: 8745361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]