These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9293628)

  • 1. A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?
    Basden BH; Basden DR; Bryner S; Thomas RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1176-91. PubMed ID: 9293628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering.
    Weldon MS; Bellinger KD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1160-1175. PubMed ID: 9293627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaborative inhibition effect: the role of memory task and retrieval method.
    Saraiva M; Albuquerque PB; Garrido MV
    Psychol Res; 2023 Nov; 87(8):2548-2558. PubMed ID: 37027039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing individual and collaborative eyewitness memory with category clustering recall.
    Thorley C
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1128-1139. PubMed ID: 29376763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists.
    Hyman IE; Cardwell BA; Roy RA
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):875-90. PubMed ID: 23439153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does collaborative remembering reduce false memories?
    Takahashi M
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Feb; 98(Pt 1):1-13. PubMed ID: 17319047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition?
    Dahlström Ö; Danielsson H; Emilsson M; Andersson J
    Memory; 2011 Feb; 19(2):140-54. PubMed ID: 21331969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: evidence for a retrieval-based account.
    Finlay F; Hitch GJ; Meudell PR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1556-67. PubMed ID: 11185782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 18324549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):962-75. PubMed ID: 19744936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition?
    Takahashi M; Saito S
    Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):722-31. PubMed ID: 15724361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 22686851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival processing eliminates collaborative inhibition.
    Reysen MB; Bliss H; Baker MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1340-1347. PubMed ID: 28398121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.
    Barber SJ; Harris CB; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 25068855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study repetition and divided attention: effects of encoding manipulations on collaborative inhibition in group recall.
    Pereira-Pasarin LP; Rajaram S
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):968-76. PubMed ID: 21503804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Group remembering: does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition?
    Weldon MS; Blair C; Huebsch PD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1568-77. PubMed ID: 11185783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collaboration and prospective memory: comparing nominal and collaborative group performance in strangers and couples.
    Browning CA; Harris CB; Van Bergen P; Barnier AJ; Rendell PG
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1206-1219. PubMed ID: 29388873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of multiple trials and computer-mediated communication on collaborative and individual semantic recall.
    Hinds JM; Payne SJ
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 28750599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.