161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9293703)
1. Relationship between maxillofacial morphology and morphological characteristics of vertical sections of the mandible obtained by CT scanning.
Kohakura S; Kasai K; Ohno I; Kanazawa E
J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1997 Jun; 39(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 9293703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning.
Tsunori M; Mashita M; Kasai K
Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 9851354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible.
Masumoto T; Hayashi I; Kawamura A; Tanaka K; Kasai K
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Feb; 23(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 11296507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Anthropometric analysis of the mandible morphology in young females with different vertical skeletal pattern].
Xie Z; Li G; Guo J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 30(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 22768772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional tomographic mapping related to primary stability and structural miniscrew characteristics.
Silvestrini Biavati A; Tecco S; Migliorati M; Festa F; Panza G; Marzo G; Gherlone E; Tetè S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 21457458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
Park J; Cho HJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.
Kasai K; Moro T; Kanazawa E; Iwasawa T
Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 8529753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tooth axis and skeletal structures in mandibular molar vertical sections in jaw deformity with facial asymmetry using MPR images.
Nojima K; Yokose T; Ishii T; Kobayashi M; Nishii Y
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2007 Nov; 48(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 18360103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study.
Porto OCL; Silva BSF; Silva JA; Estrela CRA; Alencar AHG; Bueno MDR; Estrela C
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190148. PubMed ID: 32049133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the correlation between facial index and the cortical bone thickness of the maxilla and mandible-A computer tomography based study.
Dixit S; Shyagali TR; Kambalyal P
Arch Oral Biol; 2023 Feb; 146():105606. PubMed ID: 36577312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants.
Deguchi T; Nasu M; Murakami K; Yabuuchi T; Kamioka H; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):721.e7-12. PubMed ID: 16769488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maxillofacial morphology and masseter muscle thickness in adults.
Kubota M; Nakano H; Sanjo I; Satoh K; Sanjo T; Kamegai T; Ishikawa F
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):535-42. PubMed ID: 9825556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.
Veli I; Uysal T; Baysal A; Karadede I
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):417-29. PubMed ID: 25344123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of bite force, part 2: Relationship to various cephalometric measurements.
Braun S; Bantleon HP; Hnat WP; Freudenthaler JW; Marcotte MR; Johnson BE
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 8526297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Relationship between an inclination of mandibular plane and a morphology of symphysis].
Tanaka R; Suzuki H; Maeda H; Kobayashi K
Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Feb; 48(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 2637317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between masticatory function and internal structure of the mandible based on computed tomography findings.
Sato H; Kawamura A; Yamaguchi M; Kasai K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):766-73. PubMed ID: 16360919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dental and skeletal changes in the upper and lower jaws after treatment with Schwarz appliances using cone-beam computed tomography.
Tai K; Park JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 21189775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
