These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9293718)

  • 1. Methodological considerations in the design of an obstetric database abstracted from medical records.
    Harris HE; Ellison GT; Holliday M; Lucassen E
    Methods Inf Med; 1997 Aug; 36(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 9293718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How accurate are antenatal weight measurements? A survey of hospital and community clinics in a South Thames Region NHS Trust.
    Harris HE; Ellison GT; Holliday M; Nickson C
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 1998 Apr; 12(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 9620566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Researching labour and birth events using health information records: methodological challenges.
    Flood M; Small R
    Midwifery; 2009 Dec; 25(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 18321619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perinatal information system: a methodological proposal.
    Krauss Silva L
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1996 Jun; 8(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 8885192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Management of prenatal care information: integration of the problem list and clinical comments.
    Miller J; Driscoll C; Kilpatrick S; Quillen E
    Top Health Inf Manage; 2003; 24(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 12674395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practice variation of test procedures reportedly used in routine antenatal care in The Netherlands.
    Wildschut HI; ten Hoope-Bender P; Borkent-Polet M; Traas H; van Agt HM; de Kroon ML; van der Maas PJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Jan; 78(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 9926888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of hand-written and computerised records of birth data collected at Baragwanath hospital in Soweto.
    Ellison GT; Richter LM; de Wet T; Harris HE; Griesel RD; McIntyre JA
    Curationis; 1997 Mar; 20(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9287552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The NHS Numbers for Babies (NN4B) project.
    Frith S; Jackson-Baker A
    RCM Midwives J; 2002 Apr; 5(4):120. PubMed ID: 12001385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey of computerized obstetric information systems in Austria.
    Kainz C; Lassmann R; Schaffer H; Hanzal E; Deutinger J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1992; 252(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 1471916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstetric performance recall accuracy (OPERA) among a low literacy population in Southeast Nigeria.
    Umeora OU; Egwuatu VE
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 12(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 20329672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting the use of emergency obstetric care among pregnant women with antenatal bleeding.
    Koşum Z; Yurdakul M
    Midwifery; 2013 May; 29(5):440-6. PubMed ID: 22652487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clerking tool for the patient record system.
    McDermott D; Heathfield H; Kirby J
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1664. PubMed ID: 8591534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pregnancy care of the low risk woman: the community-hospital interface.
    Kean LH; Liu DT; Macquisten S
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1996; 9(5):39-44. PubMed ID: 10162121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An audit of obstetric care in a university family medicine department and an obstetrics-gynecology department.
    Ely JW; Ueland K; Gordon MJ
    J Fam Pract; 1976 Aug; 3(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 1053498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antenatal mental health referrals: review of local clinical practice and pregnant women's experiences in England.
    Darwin Z; McGowan L; Edozien LC
    Midwifery; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e17-22. PubMed ID: 25467596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The prenatal medical record: purpose, organization and the debate of print versus electronic.
    Phelan ST
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Sep; 35(3):355-68, vii. PubMed ID: 18760224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variations in compliance with documentation using computerized obstetric records.
    Haberman S; Rotas M; Perlman K; Feldman JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 17601909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Standardized interfaces in gynecologic-obstetric documentation].
    Mink D; Tossounidis I; Schmidt W
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(9):439-41. PubMed ID: 9381840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care.
    Spurgeon P; Hicks C; Barwell F
    Midwifery; 2001 Jun; 17(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 11399133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perinatal information systems for quality improvement: visions for today.
    Slagle TA
    Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):266-77. PubMed ID: 9917470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.