These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9293718)

  • 21. Quality assurance: measuring its effect on a busy obstetric service.
    Philipson EH; Curry SL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):131-3. PubMed ID: 8272294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The quality of routinely collected maternity data.
    Cleary R; Beard RW; Coles J; Devlin HB; Hopkins A; Roberts S; Schumacher D; Wickings HI
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Dec; 101(12):1042-7. PubMed ID: 7826956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A novel management database in obstetrics and gynaecology to introduce the electronic healthcare record and improve the clinical audit process.
    El-Hayes K; Harrity C; Abu Zeineh T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 121():266-75. PubMed ID: 17095825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Evaluating an integrated obstetric data processing program for the personal computer].
    Heim K; Heis W; Dapunt O
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1991; 31 Suppl 2():380-4. PubMed ID: 1790986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Identification of pregnant patients at risk of delivering low birthweight infants in urban areas of Guatemala].
    Kestler E; Dorgan J; Sibrian R; Aquino O; Villar J
    Rev Latinoam Perinatol; 1989; 9(3):91-101. PubMed ID: 12316764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Concepts of quality assurance in obstetrics and gynecology].
    Kupka MS; Richter O; Dorn C; Tutschek B
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Aug; 123(8):477-81. PubMed ID: 11562815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Quality management with information systems].
    Thurmayr GR; Thurmayr R
    Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr; 2002; 119():797-802. PubMed ID: 12704930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Obstetric audit using routinely collected computerised data.
    Yudkin PL; Redman CW
    BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6765):1371-3. PubMed ID: 2271887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of obstetric high risk factors in a developing country.
    Lennox CE
    Trop Doct; 1984 Jul; 14(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 6464176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interprofessional Obstetric Ultrasound Education: Successful Development of Online Learning Modules; Case-Based Seminars; and Skills Labs for Registered and Advanced Practice Nurses, Midwives, Physicians, and Trainees.
    Shaw-Battista J; Young-Lin N; Bearman S; Dau K; Vargas J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(6):727-34. PubMed ID: 26769384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Obstetric data processing with a personal computer].
    Heim K; Heis W; Dapunt O
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Oct; 53(10):667-76. PubMed ID: 8270147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Supervision of peripheral obstetric units.
    Larsen JV
    Trop Doct; 1987 Apr; 17(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 3576689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A non-randomised trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of Midwifery Group Practice compared with standard maternity care arrangements in one Australian hospital.
    Toohill J; Turkstra E; Gamble J; Scuffham PA
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e874-9. PubMed ID: 22172743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Missing prenatal records at a birth center: a communication problem quantified.
    Miller DW; Yeast JD; Evans RL
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():535-9. PubMed ID: 16779097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perinatal outcome in unbooked women at the Rotunda Hospital.
    Treacy A; O'Donovan M; Byrne P
    Ir Med J; 2002 Feb; 95(2):44-7. PubMed ID: 11989946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wells S; Cooper A; Harvey M; Brew S; Wright M
    Public Health; 2003 Nov; 117(6):438-45. PubMed ID: 14522160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of record linkage to examine alcohol use in pregnancy.
    Burns L; Mattick RP; Cooke M
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2006 Apr; 30(4):642-8. PubMed ID: 16573582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Audit of medical response to antenatal booking history.
    Guthrie KA; Songane FF; Mackenzie F; Lilford RJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 May; 96(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 2757981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using emergency obstetric drills in maternity units as a performance improvement tool.
    Osman H; Campbell OM; Nassar AH
    Birth; 2009 Mar; 36(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19278382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Possible to take medical responsibility for obstetric activities at the Kiruna BB].
    Fägerquist M; Ståhle U
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Nov; 100(46):3791-2. PubMed ID: 14655341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.