BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9294028)

  • 21. Genotoxicity assessment of waste products of aluminum plasma etching with the SOS chromotest.
    Raabe F; Janz S; Wolff G; Merten H; Landrock A; Birkenfeld T; Herzschuh R
    Mutat Res; 1993 Jul; 300(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 7685499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mutagenicity of airborne particulates assessed by salmonella assay and the SOS chromotest in Wrocław, Poland.
    Piekarska K
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Aug; 60(8):993-1001. PubMed ID: 20842939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SOS chromotest, a direct assay of induction of an SOS function in Escherichia coli K-12 to measure genotoxicity.
    Quillardet P; Huisman O; D'Ari R; Hofnung M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1982 Oct; 79(19):5971-5. PubMed ID: 6821127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genotoxic activity detected in soils from a hazardous waste site by the Ames test and an SOS colorimetric test.
    McDaniels AE; Reyes AL; Wymer LJ; Rankin CC; Stelma GN
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1993; 22(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 8359153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative study of five nitro musk compounds for genotoxicity in the SOS chromotest and Salmonella mutagenicity.
    Emig M; Reinhardt A; Mersch-Sundermann V
    Toxicol Lett; 1996 Jun; 85(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 8644127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genotoxicity of 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol in the SOS chromotest and in the Ames test. Elucidation of the genotoxic mechanism.
    Hahn H; Eder E; Deininger C
    Chem Biol Interact; 1991; 80(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 1913979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mutagens in contaminated soil: a review.
    White PA; Claxton LD
    Mutat Res; 2004 Nov; 567(2-3):227-345. PubMed ID: 15572286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evidence of genotoxicity related to high PAH content of sediments in the upper part of the Seine estuary (Normandy, France).
    Cachot J; Geffard O; Augagneur S; Lacroix S; Le Menach K; Peluhet L; Couteau J; Denier X; Devier MH; Pottier D; Budzinski H
    Aquat Toxicol; 2006 Sep; 79(3):257-67. PubMed ID: 16887205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of genotoxic effects of surface waters using a battery of bioassays indicating different mode of action.
    Han Y; Li N; Oda Y; Ma M; Rao K; Wang Z; Jin W; Hong G; Li Z; Luo Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2016 Nov; 133():448-56. PubMed ID: 27517142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genotoxic and mutagenic activity of environmental air samples from different rural, urban and industrial sites in Flanders, Belgium.
    Du Four VA; Janssen CR; Brits E; Van Larebeke N
    Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 16314139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mutagenicity, genotoxicity, and estrogenic activity of river porewaters.
    Parrella A; Lavorgna M; Criscuolo E; Isidori M
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 65(3):407-20. PubMed ID: 23797980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (nitro-PAH) in the suspended substances of the atmosphere. 2. Comparison of the mutagenicity of nitro-PAH and dust extracts of the air in the Ames, SOS repair induction and SCE test].
    Schleibinger H; Leberl C; Rüden H
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1989 Aug; 188(5):421-38. PubMed ID: 2775424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Research of waste dump water mutagenicity of bacterial detection system SOS chromotest.
    Vojtková H; Janáková I
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(12):2833-7. PubMed ID: 22049707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A modified SOS-Chromotest procedure to test for genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in sediments directly without extraction.
    Dutka BJ; Teichgräber K; Lifshitz R
    Chemosphere; 1995 Sep; 31(5):3273-89. PubMed ID: 7493163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genotoxicity of PM10 and extracted organics collected in an industrial, urban and rural area in Flanders, Belgium.
    Brits E; Schoeters G; Verschaeve L
    Environ Res; 2004 Oct; 96(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 15325871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The genotoxic hazards of domestic wastes in surface waters.
    White PA; Rasmussen JB
    Mutat Res; 1998 Jun; 410(3):223-36. PubMed ID: 9630643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the water genotoxicity from Santos Estuary (Brazil) in relation to the sediment contamination and effluent discharges.
    Umbuzeiro Gde A; Kummrow F; Roubicek DA; Tominaga MY
    Environ Int; 2006 Apr; 32(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 16216325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantification of the genotoxic effects of alkylating agents in bacterial assays.
    Tenenbaum L; Malaveille C
    Mutagenesis; 1988 Jul; 3(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 3062319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genotoxicity of nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and related structures on Escherichia coli PQ37 (SOS chromotest).
    Mersch-Sundermann V; Kern S; Wintermann F
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1991; 18(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 1864268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genotoxicity risk assessment of diversely substituted quinolines using the SOS chromotest.
    Duran LT; Rincón NO; Galvis CE; Kouznetsov VV; Lorenzo JL
    Environ Toxicol; 2015 Mar; 30(3):278-92. PubMed ID: 24106140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.