These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Precision and bias of a normal finite mixture distribution model to analyze twin data when zygosity is unknown: simulations and application to IQ phenotypes on a large sample of twin pairs. Benyamin B; Deary IJ; Visscher PM Behav Genet; 2006 Nov; 36(6):935-46. PubMed ID: 16786426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Twins: a response to the question of genetic/environmental influence on development?]. Cohen-Levy J; Berdal A Orthod Fr; 2007 Mar; 78(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 17571533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Birmingham Registry for Twin and Heritability Studies (BiRTHS). Krone RE; Ewer AK; Barrett TG; Moy RJ; Bakour S; Maher ER; Thangaratinam S; Cox P; Martin B; Khan KS; Zeegers MP Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Dec; 9(6):907-12. PubMed ID: 17254429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of dentofacial morphology in monozygotic twin pairs with their siblings using LISREL. Ramsey TC; Sorin MS; Hart TC; Farrington FH J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1992; 16(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 1525073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Twins and the heritability of dentofacial phenotype]. Cohen-Levy J; Kamoun-Goldrat AS; Simon Y; Lautrou A Orthod Fr; 2007 Mar; 78(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 17571534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Approximate solutions for the maximum-likelihood estimates in models of univariate human twin data. Wijesiri UW; Williams CJ Behav Genet; 1995 May; 25(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 7598664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nicholas (Nick) G. Martin and the Extended Twin Model. Maes HH Twin Res Hum Genet; 2020 Apr; 23(2):84-86. PubMed ID: 32423500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Japanese Study of Adult Twins Reared Apart and Growing Old Separately. Hayakawa K; Kato K; Onoi M; Hayashi C; Yang-Ping C; Kanamori M; Doi S; Kikuchi H; Nishihara R; Kadota K Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Dec; 9(6):806-7. PubMed ID: 17254412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the equality of twin correlations with multinomial outcomes. Bartfay E; Donner A; Klar N Ann Hum Genet; 1999 Jul; 63(Pt 4):341-9. PubMed ID: 10738545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. University of Washington Twin Registry: construction and characteristics of a community-based twin registry. Afari N; Noonan C; Goldberg J; Edwards K; Gadepalli K; Osterman B; Evanoff C; Buchwald D Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Dec; 9(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 17254446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mortality among twins after the age of six: the programming hypothesis versus the twin-method]. Christensen K; Vaupel JW; Holm NV; Yashin AI Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Dec; 158(51):7415-9. PubMed ID: 9012061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What is the 'right' statistical measure of twin concordance (or diagnostic reliability and validity)? Kraemer HC Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1997 Dec; 54(12):1121-4. PubMed ID: 9400348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Healthy Twin: a twin-family study of Korea--protocols and current status. Sung J; Cho SI; Lee K; Ha M; Choi EY; Choi JS; Kim H; Kim J; Hong KS; Kim Y; Yoo KY; Park C; Song YM Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Dec; 9(6):844-8. PubMed ID: 17254419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]