289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9294358)
1. Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions.
Obijou C; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 9294358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Thirty-two-year follow-up study of Herbst therapy: a biometric dental cast analysis.
Pancherz H; Bjerklin K; Lindskog-Stokland B; Hansen K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 24373651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The mechanism of Class II correction in late Herbst treatment.
Konik M; Pancherz H; Hansen K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 9228846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The incisor-lip relationship in Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions.
Schweitzer M; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 2001 Oct; 71(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 11605869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
Martin J; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 10371429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance.
Bock N; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):606-13. PubMed ID: 19054814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 16644850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficiency of three mandibular anchorage forms in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation.
Weschler D; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15747811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. A radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation.
Hansen K
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992; 88():1-49. PubMed ID: 1492308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Occlusal stability of adult Class II Division 1 treatment with the Herbst appliance.
Bock NC; von Bremen J; Ruf S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 20691355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 9267575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
Pancherz H
Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduced mandibular cast splints an alternative in Herbst therapy? A prospective multicentre study.
von Bremen J; Pancherz H; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):609-13. PubMed ID: 17873147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effect of Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II and division I malocclusion: a cephalometric study in 12 patients].
Luo Y; Fang G
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Feb; 14(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 15747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
