84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9294363)
1. The reliability of three sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class II treatment.
Foley TF; Stirling DL; Hall-Scott J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):320-6; discussion 327-9. PubMed ID: 9294363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillomandibular plane angle bisector (MM) adjunctive to occlusal plane to evaluate anteroposterior measurement of dental base.
Ganiger CR; Nayak US; Cariappa KU; Ahammed AR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 23151706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The wits appraisal using three reference planes and its interaction with the ANB angle among a sub-set of Nigerians".
Ifesanya JU; Adeyemi AT; Otuyemi OD
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 43(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 26223140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The maxillary-mandibular planes angle (MM degrees) bisector: a new reference plane for anteroposterior measurement of the dental bases.
Hall-Scott J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):583-91. PubMed ID: 8198083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular growth direction with conventional Class II nonextraction treatment.
Mair AD; Hunter WS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jun; 101(6):543-9. PubMed ID: 1598894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
Del Santo M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of functional versus bisected occlusal planes on the Wits appraisal.
Thayer TA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 2333856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.
Efstratiadis S; Baumrind S; Shofer F; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Laster L; Ghafari J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):607-18. PubMed ID: 16286208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-phase treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion with the combination of the twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear.
Lv Y; Yan B; Wang L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 22858335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study.
Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Ciusa V; Morini M; Sforza C
Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 12518952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical headgear treatment and growth patterns: analysis by lateral cephalometry.
Godt A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jan; 68(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 17238052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions.
Phan XL; Schneider BJ; Sadowsky C; BeGole EA
Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 15132443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear.
Keeling SD; Wheeler TT; King GJ; Garvan CW; Cohen DA; Cabassa S; McGorray SP; Taylor MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 9457018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posttreatment changes in different facial types.
Zaher AR; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):425-36. PubMed ID: 7864464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vertical changes in high-angle Class II, division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear.
Burke M; Jacobson A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Dec; 102(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 1456230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
