These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9294558)

  • 1. Oral contrast agents for CT: a taste test survey.
    Quagliano PV; Austin RF
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):720-2. PubMed ID: 9294558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Iopamidol as an oral contrast media for computed tomography: a taste comparison to iohexol, diatrizoate sodium, and barium sulfate.
    Rogers D; Sheth C; Eisenmenger L; Mignogna E; Winter T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2822-2826. PubMed ID: 28669111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the palatability of flavored oral contrasts.
    Arya R; Hansen A; Taira BR; Packy T; Singer AJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Sep; 27(7):847-50. PubMed ID: 19683115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. E-Z-CAT. An oral contrast medium for use in computed tomography of the abdomen.
    Nyman U; Dinnetz G; Andersson I
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 6731015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
    Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Two Neutral Oral Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study.
    Dillman JR; Towbin AJ; Imbus R; Young J; Gates E; Trout AT
    Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):245-251. PubMed ID: 29737955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Telebrix: a better-tasting oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
    Bach DB
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 2039963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of barium and diatrizoate bowel labelling agents in computed tomography.
    Carr DH; Banks LM
    Br J Radiol; 1985 May; 58(689):393-4. PubMed ID: 4063689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Renal excretion of ingested gastrografin: clinical relevance in early postoperative treatment of patients who have undergone gastric surgery.
    Sohn KM; Lee SY; Kwon OH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 May; 178(5):1129-32. PubMed ID: 11959715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Inter-individual testing of water-soluble oral contrast media with reference to their diagnostic value, side effects and taste].
    Stäbler A; Fink U; Siuda S; Neville S
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 2502828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
    Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pretreatment of patients requiring oral contrast abdominal computed tomography with antiemetics: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy.
    Garra G; Singer AJ; Bamber D; Chohan J; Troxell R; Thode HC
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 53(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 18640743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial experience with oral contrast in PET/CT: phantom and clinical studies.
    Cohade C; Osman M; Nakamoto Y; Marshall LT; Links JM; Fishman EK; Wahl RL
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Mar; 44(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 12621008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-absorbable fat-dense oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
    Zwaan M; Gmelin E; Borgis KJ; Rinast E
    Eur J Radiol; 1992; 14(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 1563426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CT method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate--clinical experience in 525 cases.
    Giuliano V; Giuliano C; Pinto F; Scaglione M
    Emerg Radiol; 2005 Jul; 11(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 16133622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Water as neutral oral contrast agent in abdominopelvic CT: comparing effectiveness with Gastrografin in the same patient.
    Lee CH; Gu HZ; Vellayappan BA; Tan CH
    Med J Malaysia; 2016 Dec; 71(6):322-327. PubMed ID: 28087955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the management of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction with CT-scan and water-soluble contrast medium: a prospective study.
    Trésallet C; Lebreton N; Royer B; Leyre P; Godiris-Petit G; Menegaux F
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Nov; 52(11):1869-76. PubMed ID: 19966635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of oral contrast agents on computed tomography-based positron emission tomography attenuation correction in dual-modality positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.
    Antoch G; Jentzen W; Freudenberg LS; Stattaus J; Mueller SP; Debatin JF; Bockisch A
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Dec; 38(12):784-9. PubMed ID: 14627896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Gastromiro vs gastrografin vs prontobario CAT for computerized tomography. Multicenter study].
    Rollandi GA; Curone PF; Pastorino C; Fanti B; Martinoli C; Bonati F; Montesi A; Fabrizzi GC; Dini L; Pesaresi A
    Radiol Med; 1991 Sep; 82(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 1947265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional CT enterography using oral gastrografin in patients with small bowel obstruction: comparison with axial CT images or fluoroscopic findings.
    Hong SS; Kim AY; Kwon SB; Kim PN; Lee MG; Ha HK
    Abdom Imaging; 2010 Oct; 35(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 19756853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.