160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9294574)
1. MRI of histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma: clinical relevance of diagnostic procedures for detection of multifocal or contralateral secondary carcinoma.
Rieber A; Merkle E; Böhm W; Brambs HJ; Tomczak R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):773-9. PubMed ID: 9294574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma.
Rieber A; Merkle E; Zeitler H; Görich J; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Tomczak R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):780-4. PubMed ID: 9294575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Preoperative MR mammography in breast carcinoma. Effect on operative treatment from the surgical viewpoint].
Gatzemeier W; Liersch T; Stylianou A; Buttler A; Becker H; Fischer U
Chirurg; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1460-8. PubMed ID: 10637703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer.
Fischer U; Zachariae O; Baum F; von Heyden D; Funke M; Liersch T
Eur Radiol; 2004 Oct; 14(10):1725-31. PubMed ID: 15248080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast].
Winnekendonk G; Krug B; Warm M; Göhring UJ; Mallmann P; Lackner K
Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 15122467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Girardi V; Carbognin G; Camera L; Baglio I; Bucci A; Bonetti F; Mucelli RP
Radiol Med; 2011 Dec; 116(8):1226-38. PubMed ID: 21744256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Value of MR tomography in inconclusive mammography findings].
Buchberger W; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Obrist P; Dünser M
Radiologe; 1997 Sep; 37(9):702-9. PubMed ID: 9424615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.
Kaiser WA
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach.
Fischer U; Kopka L; Grabbe E
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):881-8. PubMed ID: 10580970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of the breast. Imaging and tissue characterization without intravenous contrast.
Santyr GE
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):673-90. PubMed ID: 7489316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic 3D-MR mammography: is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Ohmenhäuser K; Sand J; Stoll P; Claussen CD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(1):236-40. PubMed ID: 9039622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI.
Gilles R; Meunier M; Lucidarme O; Zafrani B; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon AA; Le Gal M; Vanel D; Neuenschwander S; Arriagada R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8576489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles.
Stack JP; Redmond OM; Codd MB; Dervan PA; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 2296657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [MR tomographic characterization of suspicious breast lesions with dynamic susceptibility-weighted T2* sequences].
Dannert S; Krück W; Schick F; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Rofo; 2001 Jan; 173(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 11225415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
