110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9294575)
1. Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma.
Rieber A; Merkle E; Zeitler H; Görich J; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Tomczak R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):780-4. PubMed ID: 9294575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI of breast cancer: influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity.
Rieber A; Zeitler H; Rosenthal H; Görich J; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Tomczak R
Br J Radiol; 1997 May; 70(833):452-8. PubMed ID: 9227225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRI of histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma: clinical relevance of diagnostic procedures for detection of multifocal or contralateral secondary carcinoma.
Rieber A; Merkle E; Böhm W; Brambs HJ; Tomczak R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):773-9. PubMed ID: 9294574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging in potential postsurgical recurrence of breast cancer: pitfalls and limitations.
Cohen EK; Leonhardt CM; Shumak RS; Soutar IC; Bukhanov K; Fishell EK; Plewes DB
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Jun; 47(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8640412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.
Kaiser WA
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic magnetic resonance mammography of both breasts following local excision and radiotherapy for breast carcinoma.
Murray AD; Redpath TW; Needham G; Gilbert FJ; Brookes JA; Eremin O
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):594-600. PubMed ID: 8696694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and fat suppressed magnetic resonance imaging in suspected recurrent carcinoma of the breast: preliminary experience.
Kerslake RW; Fox JN; Carleton PJ; Imrie MJ; Cook AM; Bowsley SJ; Horsman A
Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1158-68. PubMed ID: 7874413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles.
Stack JP; Redmond OM; Codd MB; Dervan PA; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 2296657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Bronge L; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1996 Mar; 37(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8600964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence after breast conserving therapy.
Belli P; Pastore G; Romani M; Terribile D; Canadè A; Costantini M
Rays; 2002; 27(4):241-57. PubMed ID: 12696288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Schlegel A; Beck R; Wendt T; Kellner W; Lommatzsch B; Untch M; Nathrath WB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(6):891-900. PubMed ID: 8227574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of the breast after surgery for breast cancer.
Whitehouse GH; Moore NR
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):591-603. PubMed ID: 7489311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic 3D-MR mammography: is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Ohmenhäuser K; Sand J; Stoll P; Claussen CD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(1):236-40. PubMed ID: 9039622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 238 histologically verified breast lesions.
Boné B; Péntek Z; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):489-96. PubMed ID: 9240665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Dynamic 3D MR mammography using a rapid gradient-echo sequence].
Müller-Schimpfle M; Rieber A; Kurz S; Stern W; Claussen CD
Rofo; 1995 Jan; 162(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 7841394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy.
Preda L; Villa G; Rizzo S; Bazzi L; Origgi D; Cassano E; Bellomi M
Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(5):R53. PubMed ID: 16959028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential of MR mammography to predict tumor grading of invasive breast cancer.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):826-33. PubMed ID: 21442559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
