These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9294760)

  • 1. Bending and fracture toughness of woven self-reinforced composite poly(methyl methacrylate).
    Wright DD; Lautenschlager EP; Gilbert JL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Sep; 36(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 9294760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interfacial properties of self-reinforced composite poly(methyl methacrylate).
    Wright DD; Lautenschlager EP; Gilbert JL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1998; 43(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 9619433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-reinforced composite poly(methyl methacrylate): static and fatigue properties.
    Gilbert JL; Ney DS; Lautenschlager EP
    Biomaterials; 1995 Sep; 16(14):1043-55. PubMed ID: 8519925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bending and fracture toughness of woven self-reinforced composite poly (methyl methacrylate).
    Wright DD; Lautenschlager EP; Gilbert JL
    Northwest Dent Res; 1996; 7(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 9487926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pin-on-disc evaluation of self-reinforced composite poly(methyl methacrylate) for total joint replacements.
    Peers WJ; Wright-Charlesworth DD; Miskioglu I
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2006 Oct; 79(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 16544304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of processing temperature and time on the structure and fracture characteristics of self-reinforced composite poly(methyl methacrylate).
    Wright DD; Gilbert JL; Lautenschlager EP
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 1999 Aug; 10(8):503-12. PubMed ID: 15348121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Static and fatigue mechanical characterizations of variable diameter fibers reinforced bone cement.
    Zhou Y; Yue W; Li C; Mason JJ
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2009 Feb; 20(2):633-41. PubMed ID: 18936882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post-draw PAN-PMMA nanofiber reinforced and toughened Bis-GMA dental restorative composite.
    Sun W; Cai Q; Li P; Deng X; Wei Y; Xu M; Yang X
    Dent Mater; 2010 Sep; 26(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 20579722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical and mechanical properties of PMMA bone cement reinforced with nano-sized titania fibers.
    Khaled SM; Charpentier PA; Rizkalla AS
    J Biomater Appl; 2011 Feb; 25(6):515-37. PubMed ID: 20207779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture toughness of titanium-cement interfaces: effects of fibers and loading angles.
    Khandaker M; Utsaha KC; Morris T
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2014; 9():1689-97. PubMed ID: 24729704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flow intrusion characteristics and fracture properties of titanium-fibre-reinforced bone cement.
    Topoleski LD; Ducheyne P; Cuckler JM
    Biomaterials; 1998 Sep; 19(17):1569-77. PubMed ID: 9830982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of thermal cycling on composites reinforced with two differently sized silica-glass fibers.
    Meriç G; Ruyter IE
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1157-63. PubMed ID: 17118440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reinforcement of a PMMA resin for interim fixed prostheses with silica nanoparticles.
    Topouzi M; Kontonasaki E; Bikiaris D; Papadopoulou L; Paraskevopoulos KM; Koidis P
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 May; 69():213-222. PubMed ID: 28088693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Graphene oxide versus graphene for optimisation of PMMA bone cement for orthopaedic applications.
    Paz E; Forriol F; Del Real JC; Dunne N
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Aug; 77():1003-1011. PubMed ID: 28531971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcement of bone cement using zirconia fibers with and without acrylic coating.
    Kotha S; Li C; Schmid S; Mason J
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Mar; 88(4):898-906. PubMed ID: 18384160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Material Mismatch Effect on the Fracture of a Bone-Composite Cement Interface.
    Khandaker M; Tarantini S
    Adv Mater Sci Appl; 2012 Dec; 1(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24761427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Three-Parameter Weibull Distribution Method to Determine the Fracture Property of PMMA Bone Cement.
    Li L; Cao H; Guan J; He S; Niu L; Liu H
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Aug; 14(17):. PubMed ID: 36080664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Porosity on Fracture Toughness and Fracture Behavior of Antibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement.
    Kim S; Baril C; Rudraraju S; Ploeg HL
    J Biomech Eng; 2022 Jan; 144(1):. PubMed ID: 34286825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture toughness of Kevlar 29/poly(methyl methacrylate) composite materials for surgical implantations.
    Pourdeyhimi B; Robinson HH; Schwartz P; Wagner HD
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1986; 14(3):277-94. PubMed ID: 3767094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elastic and ultimate properties of acrylic bone cement reinforced with ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene fibers.
    Pourdeyhimi B; Wagner HD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Jan; 23(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 2708405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.