147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9296179)
1. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced gradient-echo and spin-echo sequences in MR of head and neck neoplasms.
Escott EJ; Rao VM; Ko WD; Guitierrez JE
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1997 Sep; 18(8):1411-9. PubMed ID: 9296179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast spin-echo imaging of the neck: comparison with conventional spin-echo, utility of fat suppression, and evaluation of tissue contrast characteristics.
Lewin JS; Curtin HD; Ross JS; Weissman JL; Obuchowski NA; Tkach JA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Aug; 15(7):1351-7. PubMed ID: 7976949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences.
Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR diagnosis of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors versus hemangiomas: relative merits of dynamic gadolinium chelate-enhanced gradient-recalled echo and unenhanced spin-echo images.
Soyer P; Gueye C; Somveille E; Laissy JP; Scherrer A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1407-13. PubMed ID: 7484575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck.
Wu X; Raz E; Block TK; Geppert C; Hagiwara M; Bruno MT; Fatterpekar GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):883-9. PubMed ID: 25247956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of metastatic cervical adenopathy using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Fischbein NJ; Noworolski SM; Henry RG; Kaplan MJ; Dillon WP; Nelson SJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Mar; 24(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 12637272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging of head and neck lymph nodes.
Mack MG; Balzer JO; Straub R; Eichler K; Vogl TJ
Radiology; 2002 Jan; 222(1):239-44. PubMed ID: 11756732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
Low RN; Sigeti JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection and characterization of metastatic cervical adenopathy by MR imaging: comparison of different MR techniques.
van den Brekel MW; Castelijns JA; Stel HV; Valk J; Croll GA; Golding RP; Luth WJ; Meyer CJ; Snow GB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(4):581-9. PubMed ID: 2370357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic and conventional spin-echo MR of pituitary microlesions.
Bartynski WS; Lin L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1997 May; 18(5):965-72. PubMed ID: 9159378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved detection and delineation of head and neck lesions with fat suppression spin-echo MR imaging.
Tien RD; Hesselink JR; Chu PK; Szumowski J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 1846994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination compared with spin-echo T1-weighted imaging of head and neck tumors.
Kataoka M; Ueda H; Koyama T; Umeoka S; Togashi K; Asato R; Tanaka S; Ito J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):313-9. PubMed ID: 15615994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of the chest using a contrast-enhanced breath-hold modified three-dimensional gradient-echo technique: comparison with two-dimensional gradient-echo technique and multidetector CT.
Karabulut N; Martin DR; Yang M; Tallaksen RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1225-33. PubMed ID: 12388503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of clinical, surgical, pathologic, and MR fat suppression results for head and neck cancer.
Tien RD; Robbins KT
Head Neck; 1992; 14(4):278-84. PubMed ID: 1325416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging with turbo inversion recovery sequence in head and neck tumors.
Sadick M; Sadick H; Hörmann K; Düber C; Diehl SJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 262(8):634-9. PubMed ID: 15668813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recurrent inverted papilloma: diagnosis with pharmacokinetic dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.
Lai PH; Yang CF; Pan HB; Wu MT; Chu ST; Ger LP; Huang WC; Hsu CC; Lee CN
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1999 Sep; 20(8):1445-51. PubMed ID: 10512227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
