138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9297374)
1. Using a computer to track image quality and diagnostic error.
Dockray KT; Sawyer JW; Elks ML; Vines DL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):635-6. PubMed ID: 9297374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Best in practice: a model for improved radiologist-technologist collaboration and image optimization.
Recht M; Kim D; Lawson K; Mulholland T
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Apr; 8(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 21458769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Roentgen's image: what's in a name?
Martinez KC
Adm Radiol J; 1998; 17(9-10):21-3. PubMed ID: 10345953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Part two: Implementing a shared quality assurance program.
Lindstrom R
Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Mar; 56(3):32-4. PubMed ID: 421982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Quality assurance in diagnostic radiology].
Hodler J
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1995 Jan; 125(3):57-64. PubMed ID: 7846498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Why quality management is imposed in radiology?].
Leclet H
J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 81(6):591-5. PubMed ID: 10844335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiologic quality control and servicing.
Health Devices; 1992; 21(6-7):188-230. PubMed ID: 1639624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rural healthcare built on shared values.
Spencer H
Adm Radiol J; 1999; 19(2-3):25-7. PubMed ID: 10557941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of a Technologist-Centered Electronic Review and Feedback System on Image Quality.
Chung JH; Haas K; Liu L; Zhu W; Geyer M; Chang PJ; Katzman GL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Oct; 15(10):1437-1442. PubMed ID: 29503147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reject film study. Cost and quality considerations in a radiology department.
Glaser SM; Dehn TG
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Jun; 6(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 6773009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radiology guidelines. From a memorandum by the Social Insurance Society].
Chirurg; 1990 May; 61(5):suppl 74-5. PubMed ID: 2364765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The benefits of using CQI/TQM data.
Dowd SB; Tilson E
Radiol Technol; 1996; 67(6):533-7. PubMed ID: 8827822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology.
Alpert HR; Hillman BJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17411540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care.
Halsted MJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):984-7. PubMed ID: 17411742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [PC-assisted network for quality control in film development].
Buchberger W; Giacomuzzi SM; Springer P
Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 9081409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review comments augment diagnostic error characterization and departmental quality assurance: 1-year experience from a children's hospital.
Iyer RS; Swanson JO; Otto RK; Weinberger E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 23255752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new concept in radiology QA in a large setting.
Tomlinson D; Stapleman K
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(2):30-7. PubMed ID: 10179190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnostic radiology at university clinics--are new structures desirable?].
Gerhardt P
Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Jan; 48(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 7871438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
