These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9297374)
1. Using a computer to track image quality and diagnostic error. Dockray KT; Sawyer JW; Elks ML; Vines DL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):635-6. PubMed ID: 9297374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Best in practice: a model for improved radiologist-technologist collaboration and image optimization. Recht M; Kim D; Lawson K; Mulholland T J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Apr; 8(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 21458769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Why quality management is imposed in radiology?]. Leclet H J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 81(6):591-5. PubMed ID: 10844335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiologic quality control and servicing. Health Devices; 1992; 21(6-7):188-230. PubMed ID: 1639624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rural healthcare built on shared values. Spencer H Adm Radiol J; 1999; 19(2-3):25-7. PubMed ID: 10557941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of a Technologist-Centered Electronic Review and Feedback System on Image Quality. Chung JH; Haas K; Liu L; Zhu W; Geyer M; Chang PJ; Katzman GL J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Oct; 15(10):1437-1442. PubMed ID: 29503147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reject film study. Cost and quality considerations in a radiology department. Glaser SM; Dehn TG QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Jun; 6(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 6773009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radiology guidelines. From a memorandum by the Social Insurance Society]. Chirurg; 1990 May; 61(5):suppl 74-5. PubMed ID: 2364765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique. Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The benefits of using CQI/TQM data. Dowd SB; Tilson E Radiol Technol; 1996; 67(6):533-7. PubMed ID: 8827822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology. Alpert HR; Hillman BJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17411540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care. Halsted MJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):984-7. PubMed ID: 17411742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [PC-assisted network for quality control in film development]. Buchberger W; Giacomuzzi SM; Springer P Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 9081409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review comments augment diagnostic error characterization and departmental quality assurance: 1-year experience from a children's hospital. Iyer RS; Swanson JO; Otto RK; Weinberger E AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 23255752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new concept in radiology QA in a large setting. Tomlinson D; Stapleman K Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(2):30-7. PubMed ID: 10179190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania. Sniureviciute M; Adliene D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnostic radiology at university clinics--are new structures desirable?]. Gerhardt P Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Jan; 48(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 7871438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]