These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9297950)

  • 1. Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions II.
    Kaplowitz GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Sep; 128(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 9297950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions.
    Kaplowitz GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Feb; 127(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 8682993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study.
    Larson TD; Nielsen MA; Brackett WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):625-7. PubMed ID: 12131884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate dies for in-office indirect resin restorations.
    Beggs RJ
    Dent Today; 2000 Sep; 19(9):144-9. PubMed ID: 12524736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.
    Reddy JM; Prashanti E; Kumar GV; Suresh Sajjan MC; Mathew X
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technique and materials for obtaining accurate impressions in 60 to 90 seconds.
    Werrin SR
    Dent Today; 2003 Mar; 22(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 12705017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the occlusal contact of crowns fabricated with the bite impression method.
    Makino S; Okada D; Shin C; Ogura R; Ikeda M; Miura H
    J Med Dent Sci; 2013 Sep; 60(3):73-81. PubMed ID: 24146169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quadrant tray and bite registration as an alternative to dual-arch impressions for fixed prosthetics: a clinical and dental laboratory technique.
    Hammond BD; Myers ML; Haywood VB
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 22313819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single step approach to make diagnostic impressions of both the arches and face bow transfer: a novel technique.
    Komuravelli AK; Suresh Sajjan MC
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 22842240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory work for restorative dentistry: model pouring and die preparation.
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 23220299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An effect of tray design and material retention on the linear dimensional changes in polysulfide impressions.
    Walters RA; Spurrier S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 2407824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A procedure for making fixed prosthodontic impressions with the use of preformed crown shells.
    Dimashkieh MR; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jan; 73(1):95-6. PubMed ID: 7699606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual-arch impressions.
    Bass EV; Kafalias MC
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1567288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.