These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9297957)

  • 1. Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response.
    Hochman M; Chiarello D; Hochman CB; Lopatkin R; Pergola S
    N Y State Dent J; 1997; 63(7):24-9. PubMed ID: 9297957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Wand vs. traditional injection: a comparison of pain related behaviors.
    Gibson RS; Allen K; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 11132503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of anesthetic flow rate delivered by the Wand Local Anesthetic System on pain response to palatal injections.
    Primosch RE; Brooks R
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12074223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pain perception and utility: a comparison of the syringe and computerized local injection techniques.
    Nicholson JW; Berry TG; Summitt JB; Yuan CH; Witten TM
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 12004696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe.
    Ram D; Peretz B
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 14528773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of site preparation methods on the pain reported during palatal infiltration using the Wand Local Anesthetic System.
    Johnson J; Primosch RE
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 12967069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The wand in pulp therapy: an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Oztaş N; Ulusu T; Bodur H; Doğan C
    Quintessence Int; 2005; 36(7-8):559-64. PubMed ID: 15997937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 21st century computerized injection system for local pain control.
    Friedman MJ; Hochman MN
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Oct; 18(10):995-1000, 1002-3; quiz 1004. PubMed ID: 9533309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The wand versus traditional injection for mandibular nerve block in children and adolescents: perceived pain and time of onset.
    Palm AM; Kirkegaard U; Poulsen S
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):481-4. PubMed ID: 15646908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe.
    Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
    Br Dent J; 2008 Jul; 205(1):E2; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 18493254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of the systems used for providing local anesthesia in dentistry--the Wand (Milestone Scientific) and Injex (Rosch)].
    Zarzecka J; Gończowski K; Kesek B; Darczuk D; Zapała J
    Przegl Lek; 2006; 63(12):1304-9. PubMed ID: 17642145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pain associated with local anesthetic injection in eyelid procedures: Comparison of microprocessor-controlled versus traditional syringe techniques.
    Lee EW; Tucker NA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 17237688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient and dentist satisfaction with a computerized local anesthetic injection system.
    Grace EG; Barnes DM; Macek MD; Tatum N
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Sep; 21(9):746-8, 750, 752. PubMed ID: 11199649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized anesthesia delivery system vs. traditional syringe: comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children.
    Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 16324138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a controlled injection pressure system with a conventional technique.
    Goodell GG; Gallagher FJ; Nicoll BK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Jul; 90(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 10884642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pain and anxiety reduction using a manual stimulation distraction device when administering local analgesia oro-dental injections: a multi-center clinical investigation.
    Touyz LZ; Lamontagne P; Smith BE
    J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(3):88-92. PubMed ID: 15688965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of effectiveness of two local anesthetic techniques in men undergoing no-scalpel vasectomy.
    White MA; Maatman TJ
    Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1187-9. PubMed ID: 18158044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pain Perception: Computerized versus Traditional Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients.
    Mittal M; Kumar A; Srivastava D; Sharma P; Sharma S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 26551372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Wand with a conventional technique.
    Sumer M; Misir F; Koyuturk AE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):e106-9. PubMed ID: 16731373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized split-mouth clinical trial comparing 
pain experienced during palatal injections with traditional syringe versus controlled-flow delivery Calaject technique.
    Romero-Galvez J; Berini-Aytés L; Figueiredo R; Arnabat-Dominguez J
    Quintessence Int; 2016; 47(9):797-802. PubMed ID: 27446999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.