These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9298084)

  • 1. Classifying rehabilitation inpatients by expected functional gain.
    Stineman MG; Goin JE; Tassoni CJ; Granger CV; Williams SV
    Med Care; 1997 Sep; 35(9):963-73. PubMed ID: 9298084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discharge motor FIM-function related groups.
    Stineman MG; Goin JE; Granger CV; Fiedler R; Williams SV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 78(9):980-5. PubMed ID: 9305272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation.
    Stineman MG; Escarce JJ; Goin JE; Hamilton BB; Granger CV; Williams SV
    Med Care; 1994 Apr; 32(4):366-79. PubMed ID: 8139301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional gain and length of stay for major rehabilitation impairment categories. Patterns revealed by function related groups.
    Stineman MG; Hamilton BB; Goin JE; Granger CV; Fiedler RC
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1996; 75(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 8645443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring casemix, severity, and complexity in geriatric patients undergoing rehabilitation.
    Stineman MG
    Med Care; 1997 Jun; 35(6 Suppl):JS90-105; discussion JS106-12. PubMed ID: 9191719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of function-related groups version 2.0: a classification system for medical rehabilitation.
    Stineman MG; Tassoni CJ; Escarce JJ; Goin JE; Granger CV; Fiedler RC; Williams SV
    Health Serv Res; 1997 Oct; 32(4):529-48. PubMed ID: 9327817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of functional independence measure-function related groups and resource utilization groups-version III systems across post acute settings.
    Eilertsen TB; Kramer AM; Schlenker RE; Hrincevich CA
    Med Care; 1998 May; 36(5):695-705. PubMed ID: 9596060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Four methods for characterizing disability in the formation of function related groups.
    Stineman MG; Hamilton BB; Granger CV; Goin JE; Escarce JJ; Williams SV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Dec; 75(12):1277-83. PubMed ID: 7993164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency pattern analysis for medical rehabilitation.
    Stineman MG; Goin JE; Hamilton BB; Granger CV
    Am J Med Qual; 1995; 10(4):190-8. PubMed ID: 8547798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A modular case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation illustrated.
    Stineman MG; Granger CV
    Health Care Financ Rev; 1997; 19(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 10180004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories.
    Stineman MG; Shea JA; Jette A; Tassoni CJ; Ottenbacher KJ; Fiedler R; Granger CV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Nov; 77(11):1101-8. PubMed ID: 8931518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic coding and medical rehabilitation length of stay: their relationship.
    Stineman MG; Escarce JJ; Tassoni CJ; Goin JE; Granger CV; Williams SV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Mar; 79(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 9523773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and administrative outcomes during publicly-funded inpatient stroke rehabilitation based on a case-mix group classification model.
    Gagnon D; Nadeau S; Tam V
    J Rehabil Med; 2005 Jan; 37(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 15788332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Casemix classification payment for sub-acute and non-acute inpatient care, Thailand.
    Khiaocharoen O; Pannarunothai S; Zungsontiporn C; Riewpaiboon W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jul; 93(7):849-59. PubMed ID: 20649066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a casemix classification system for inpatient rehabilitation services: stage 1 of the Victorian Rehabilitation Project.
    Webster F
    Aust Health Rev; 1996; 19(3):81-92. PubMed ID: 10162010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of functional outcome in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury after inpatient rehabilitation: in Saudi Arabia.
    Abdul-Sattar AB
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2014 Jan; 35(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 24990019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inpatient rehabilitation after stroke: a comparison of lengths of stay and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs health care system.
    Stineman MG; Ross RN; Hamilton BB; Maislin G; Bates B; Granger CV; Asch DA
    Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 11176550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Function-based classification for stroke rehabilitation and issues of reimbursement: Using patient classification systems to scale payment to patient complexity.
    Stineman MG
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 1994 Sep; 1(3):40-50. PubMed ID: 27680954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rehabilitation fees, length of stay and efficiency for hospitalized stroke patients: a preliminary study based on function-related groups.
    Lin JH; Hsiao SF; Liu CK; Lin YT
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2001 Sep; 17(9):475-83. PubMed ID: 11842651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM).
    Hamilton BB; Laughlin JA; Fiedler RC; Granger CV
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1994 Sep; 26(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 7801060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.