172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9298168)
1. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study.
Andersson-Wenckert IE; Folkesson UH; van Dijken JW
Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Aug; 55(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 9298168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results.
Hse KM; Wei SH
J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Aug; 128(8):1088-96. PubMed ID: 9260418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars.
Gross LC; Griffen AL; Casamassimo PS
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11242726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation.
Andersson-Wenckert I; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 17123909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.
Duggal MS; Toumba KJ; Sharma NK
Br Dent J; 2002 Sep; 193(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 12368893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.
van Dijken JW
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11317385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months.
Welbury RR; Shaw AJ; Murray JJ; Gordon PH; McCabe JF
Br Dent J; 2000 Jul; 189(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 10975160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in class III cavities.
van Dijken JW
Eur J Oral Sci; 1999 Jun; 107(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 10424386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.
Folkesson UH; Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW
Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10371000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation.
Marks LA; Weerheijm KL; van Amerongen WE; Groen HJ; Martens LC
Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 10460963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
Eur J Oral Sci; 2004 Apr; 112(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 15056118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
