These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9298168)

  • 21. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions.
    Sengul F; Gurbuz T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 26161601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars.
    Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 34(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 19953810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The marginal seal of various restorative materials in primary molars.
    Morabito A; Defabianis P
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 22(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 9643205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Restoration of primary molars using a new "compomer" material.
    Swift EJ; Vann WF
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1995 Oct; 7(8):25-30; quiz 32. PubMed ID: 9002898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A clinical study of adhesive amalgam in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML; Tylka JA; Sandrik J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Apr; 20(4):331-4, 336, 338 passim; quiz 344. PubMed ID: 11692340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical evaluation of a hybrid composite and a polyacid-modified composite resin in Class-II restorations in deciduous molars.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Hellwig E
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 9927911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
    Hübel S; Mejàre I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of compomer proximal restorations in primary molars: a retrospective study in children.
    Mass E; Gordon M; Fuks AB
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(2):93-7, 84. PubMed ID: 10431617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conservative interproximal box-only polyacid modified composite restorations in primary molars, twelve-month clinical results.
    Marks LA; van Amerongen WE; Kreulen CM; Weerheijm KL; Martens LC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(1):23-9, 12. PubMed ID: 10360200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
    Cehreli ZC; Cetinguc A; Cengiz SB; Altay AN
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.
    Croll TP; Bar-Zion Y; Segura A; Donly KJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interfacial adaptation of in vivo aged polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) restorations in primary molars. A SEM evaluation.
    Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec; 2(4):184-90. PubMed ID: 10388392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of four different dental restorative materials: one-year results.
    Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2008; 118(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 18491670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-year results.
    Peters TC; Roeters JJ; Frankenmolen FW
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 9522693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.