BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9299074)

  • 1. On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences.
    Osterhout L
    Brain Lang; 1997 Oct; 59(3):494-522. PubMed ID: 9299074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic anomaly detection in school-aged children during natural sentence reading - A study of fixation-related brain potentials.
    Loberg O; Hautala J; Hämäläinen JA; Leppänen PHT
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209741. PubMed ID: 30589889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words.
    Van Petten C; Kutas M
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):95-112. PubMed ID: 2017035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of emotional words on sentence processing: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Martín-Loeches M; Fernández A; Schacht A; Sommer W; Casado P; Jiménez-Ortega L; Fondevila S
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3262-72. PubMed ID: 22982604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. N400 and P600 or the role of the ERP correlates in sentence comprehension: some applications to the Italian language.
    Balconi M; Pozzoli U
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jul; 131(3):268-302. PubMed ID: 15248594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the P600/SPS affected by the richness of semantic content? A linguistic ERP study in Swedish.
    Ericsson E; Olofsson JK; Nordin S; Rudolfsson T; Sandström G
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18190397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography.
    Service E; Helenius P; Maury S; Salmelin R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1193-205. PubMed ID: 17583994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension.
    Friederici AD; Gunter TC; Hahne A; Mauth K
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jan; 15(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 15106851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of phonological and semantic features of sentence-ending words on visual event-related brain potentials.
    Connolly JF; Phillips NA; Forbes KA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Apr; 94(4):276-87. PubMed ID: 7537200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials.
    Payne BR; Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1456-69. PubMed ID: 26311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG.
    Kielar A; Panamsky L; Links KA; Meltzer JA
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 105():507-24. PubMed ID: 25463470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making sense of sentences in schizophrenia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal interactions between semantic and syntactic processing.
    Kuperberg GR; Sitnikova T; Goff D; Holcomb PJ
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2006 May; 115(2):251-65. PubMed ID: 16737390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    Eckstein K; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):130-43. PubMed ID: 15967649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain potentials elicited by prose-embedded linguistic anomalies.
    Osterhout L; Allen MD; McLaughlin J; Inoue K
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Dec; 30(8):1304-12. PubMed ID: 12661861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.
    Osterhout L; Holcomb PJ; Swinney DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jul; 20(4):786-803. PubMed ID: 8064247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anticipating words and their gender: an event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading.
    Wicha NY; Moreno EM; Kutas M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1272-88. PubMed ID: 15453979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic and syntactic errors during language processing].
    Münte TF; Heinze HJ; Prevedel H
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1990 Jun; 21(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 2113458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency-based Segregation of Syntactic and Semantic Unification during Online Sentence Level Language Comprehension.
    Bastiaansen M; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2095-107. PubMed ID: 26042498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.