287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9299250)
1. Relationship of nonstaging pathological risk factors to lymph node metastasis and recurrence in clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma.
Bell JG; Minnick A; Reid GC; Judis J; Brownell M
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Sep; 66(3):388-92. PubMed ID: 9299250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occult lymph node metastases detected by cytokeratin immunohistochemistry predict recurrence in node-negative endometrial cancer.
Yabushita H; Shimazu M; Yamada H; Sawaguchi K; Noguchi M; Nakanishi M; Kawai M
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Feb; 80(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 11161851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endometrial cancer: can nodal status be predicted with curettage?
Mariani A; Sebo TJ; Katzmann JA; Roche PC; Keeney GL; Lesnick TG; Podratz KC
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):594-600. PubMed ID: 15721399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.
Watari H; Todo Y; Takeda M; Ebina Y; Yamamoto R; Sakuragi N
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15721407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA aneuploidy is associated with increased mortality for stage I endometrial cancer.
Terada K; Mattson D; Goo D; Shimizu D
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 15581950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA flow cytometric analysis of clinical stage I endometrial carcinomas with lymph node metastases.
Coleman RL; Schink JC; Miller DS; Bauer KD; August CZ; Rademaker AW; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8349159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of DNA ploidy in endometrial cancer.
Ikeda M; Watanabe Y; Nanjoh T; Noda K
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 8349160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prognostic factors in diagnosed endometrial cancers determining the type of radical surgery].
Ivanov S; Tomov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2009; 48(3):14-9. PubMed ID: 20198758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry for lymph node metastases in endometrial carcinoma.
Iwai K; Fukuda K; Hachisuga T; Mori M; Uchiyama M; Iwasaka T; Sugimori H
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Mar; 72(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 10053107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology.
Lutman CV; Havrilesky LJ; Cragun JM; Secord AA; Calingaert B; Berchuck A; Clarke-Pearson DL; Soper JT
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 16406063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multivariate analysis of bcl-2, apoptosis, P53 and HER-2/neu in breast cancer: a short-term follow-up.
el-Ahmady O; el-Salahy E; Mahmoud M; Wahab MA; Eissa S; Khalifa A
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2493-9. PubMed ID: 12174951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percent surface area involvement is a predictor of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.
Axtell AE; Kelley JL; Fader AN; Gupta D; Schwartz B; Comerci JT; Lin Y; Weiand S; Gallion HH; Kanbour-Shakir A
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 107(3):482-6. PubMed ID: 17850853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Study on cytokeratin and CA125 for diagnosing lymph node micrometastases in endometrial cancer].
Liu FH; Wang YF; Wang J; Xue Q; Jiang S; Ma YY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 39(9):612-5. PubMed ID: 15498190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Expression of p53 protein in women with endometrial cancer].
Ivanov S; Khadzhiolov N; Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2001; 40(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 11803862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymphovascular space invasion does not predict vaginal relapses in stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.
Desrosiers L; Fadare O; Xiao ZF; Dresser K; Wang SA
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Apr; 12(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 18325471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymphvascular space involvement: an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer.
Briët JM; Hollema H; Reesink N; Aalders JG; Mourits MJ; ten Hoor KA; Pras E; Boezen HM; van der Zee AG; Nijman HW
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):799-804. PubMed ID: 15721428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis of p53 expression in endometrial cancer: prognostic value and relation to ploidy.
Graesslin O; Chantot-Bastaraud S; Lorenzato M; Birembaut P; Quéreux C; Daraï E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):484-92. PubMed ID: 18071824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in endometrial carcinoma].
Li B; Wu LY; Li SM; Zhang WH; Zhang R; Ma SK
Ai Zheng; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1085-8. PubMed ID: 15363208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic significance of serous and clear cell adenocarcinoma in surgically staged endometrial carcinoma.
Sakuragi N; Hareyama H; Todo Y; Yamada H; Yamamoto R; Fujino T; Sagawa T; Fujimoto S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Apr; 79(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 10746848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.
Gadducci A; Cosio S; Fanucchi A; Cristofani R; Genazzani AR
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10928137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
