166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9300017)
1. Improving the accuracy of Pap smears.
Evans TC
Postgrad Med; 1997 Sep; 102(3):63. PubMed ID: 9300017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pap smear refined.
Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
Linder J
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The current status of the Papanicolaou smear.
Shingleton HM; Patrick RL; Johnston WW; Smith RA
CA Cancer J Clin; 1995; 45(5):305-20. PubMed ID: 7656133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blinded review of Papanicolaou smears.
Gill GW
Cancer; 2005 Apr; 105(2):53-5. PubMed ID: 15662699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pap smears. Still a reliable screening tool for cervical cancer.
Stack PS
Postgrad Med; 1997 Apr; 101(4):207-8, 211-4. PubMed ID: 9126213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA '88) on the incidence of invasive cervical cancer.
Helfand M; O'Connor GT; Zimmer-Gembeck M; Beck JR
Med Care; 1992 Dec; 30(12):1067-82. PubMed ID: 1453813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. A study of 34 cases.
Lee KR; Minter LJ; Granter SR
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jan; 107(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 8980364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blinded review of papanicolaou smears.
Frable WJ
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 15211470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When your patient asks: "Doctor, I read there have been serious Pap smear errors. Shouldn't I get one of those new computer Pap smears?".
Boronow RC; Cavett JR
J Miss State Med Assoc; 1998 Apr; 39(4):136-41. PubMed ID: 9585689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The adequate Papanicolaou smear revisited.
Greening SE
Diagn Cytopathol; 1985; 1(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3836072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Papanicolaou smear: can we make a good test better? Technical and interpretive challenges for the practitioner.
Eltabbakh GH; Eltabbakh GD
J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 1999 May; 8(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 10839701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Update on the Papanicolaou smear: new issues for the 1990s.
Ollayos CW
Mil Med; 1997 Aug; 162(8):521-3. PubMed ID: 9271901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pap smear.
Mehta V; Vasanth V; Balachandran C
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2009; 75(2):214-6. PubMed ID: 19293526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pap smears and screening for cervical neoplasia.
Wilkinson EJ
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 33(4):817-25. PubMed ID: 2289348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cervical pap smears: techniques and clinical significance].
Lambert C
Rev Med Liege; 1999 Apr; 54(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 10389474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scheduling Pap smears for asymptomatic women.
Gohagan JK; Swift JG
Prev Med; 1981 Nov; 10(6):741-53. PubMed ID: 6276879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Review of negative Papanicolaou tests: is the retrospective 5-year review necessary.
Rubio CA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Aug; 102(2):266. PubMed ID: 8042598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The merits of new alternatives to the Papanicolaou test.
Ellison E
CMAJ; 2001 Sep; 165(6):739-40. PubMed ID: 11584557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Follow-up of unsatisfactory Papanicolaou test results.
McGaraghan A; Smith-McCune K
JAMA; 2000 Mar; 283(10):1290-1. PubMed ID: 10714724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
