These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9300297)

  • 1. Shock-induced dispersion of ventricular repolarization: implications for the induction of ventricular fibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Behrens S; Li C; Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):998-1008. PubMed ID: 9300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Myocardial vulnerability to T wave shocks: relation to shock strength, shock coupling interval, and dispersion of ventricular repolarization.
    Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Mar; 7(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 8867297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Induction of ventricular fibrillation by T-wave field-shocks in the isolated perfused rabbit heart: role of nonuniform shock responses.
    Kirchhof PF; Fabritz CL; Behrens S; Franz MR
    Basic Res Cardiol; 1997 Feb; 92(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 9062650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The zone of vulnerability to T wave shocks in humans.
    Swerdlow CD; Martin DJ; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Chen PS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9147699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks. Implications for defibrillation efficacy.
    Behrens S; Li C; Kirchhof P; Fabritz FL; Franz MR
    Circulation; 1996 Oct; 94(8):1974-80. PubMed ID: 8873676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High dispersion of ventricular repolarization after an implantable defibrillator shock predicts induction of ventricular fibrillation as well as unsuccessful defibrillation.
    Moubarak JB; Karasik PE; Fletcher RD; Franz MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Feb; 35(2):422-7. PubMed ID: 10676690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lidocaine increases the proarrhythmic effects of monophasic but not biphasic shocks.
    Sims JJ; Miller AW; Ujhelyi MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Dec; 12(12):1363-8. PubMed ID: 11797993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The vulnerable period for low and high energy T-wave shocks: role of dispersion of repolarisation and effect of d-sotalol.
    Kirchhof PF; Fabritz CL; Zabel M; Franz MR
    Cardiovasc Res; 1996 Jun; 31(6):953-62. PubMed ID: 8759252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mechanism of induction and termination of ventricular fibrillation--significance of dispersion of ventricular repolarization].
    Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR; Schultheiss HP
    Z Kardiol; 2000 Dec; 89(12):1098-107. PubMed ID: 11201025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of long-term amiodarone treatment on ventricular-fibrillation vulnerability and defibrillation efficacy in response to monophasic and biphasic shocks.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 30(4):412-8. PubMed ID: 9335398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induction of ventricular fibrillation by T wave shocks: observations from monophasic action potential recordings.
    Shepard RK; Wood MA; Dan D; Clemo HF; Gilligan DM; Ellenbogen KA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 3(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 10525249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arrhythmogenic changes in action potential configuration in the ventricle induced by DC shocks.
    Kodama I; Sakuma I; Shibata N; Honjo H; Toyama J
    J Electrocardiol; 1999; 32 Suppl():92-9. PubMed ID: 10688309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pacing after shocks stronger than the upper limit of vulnerability: impact on fibrillation induction.
    Chattipakorn N; Fotuhi PC; Sreenan CM; White JB; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(11):1337-43. PubMed ID: 10725296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ventricular proarrhythmic effects of ventricular cycle length and shock strength in a sheep model of transvenous atrial defibrillation.
    Ayers GM; Alferness CA; Ilina M; Wagner DO; Sirokman WA; Adams JM; Griffin JC
    Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):413-22. PubMed ID: 8281677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Successful implantation of cardiac defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation using upper limit of vulnerability testing.
    Green UB; Garg A; Al-Kandari F; Ungab G; Tone L; Feld GK
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Feb; 8(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 12652181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of pacing site on ventricular fibrillation initiation by shocks during the vulnerable period.
    Idriss SF; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1999 Nov; 277(5):H2065-82. PubMed ID: 10564163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of lidocaine on shock-induced vulnerability.
    Li L; Nikolski V; Efimov IR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Oct; 14(10 Suppl):S237-48. PubMed ID: 14760929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relation of atrial refractoriness to upper and lower limits of vulnerability for atrial fibrillation/flutter following implantable ventricular defibrillator shocks.
    Katz A; Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR; Prystowsky EN
    Circulation; 1999 Sep; 100(10):1125-30. PubMed ID: 10477539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.