BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9300354)

  • 1. On the recording of sample times and parameter estimation from repeated measures pharmacokinetic data.
    Sun H; Ette EI; Ludden TM
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1996 Dec; 24(6):637-50. PubMed ID: 9300354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters in the presence of non-compliance.
    Mu S; Ludden TM
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2003 Feb; 30(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 12800807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Balanced designs in longitudinal population pharmacokinetic studies.
    Ette EI; Sun H; Ludden TM
    J Clin Pharmacol; 1998 May; 38(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 9602953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ignorability and parameter estimation in longitudinal pharmacokinetic studies.
    Ette EI; Sun H; Ludden TM
    J Clin Pharmacol; 1998 Mar; 38(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 9549660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A pharmacometric case study regarding the sensitivity of structural model parameter estimation to error in patient reported dosing times.
    Knights J; Rohatagi S
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2015 Dec; 42(6):627-37. PubMed ID: 26209956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal sampling times for a drug and its metabolite using SIMCYP(®) simulations as prior information.
    Dumont C; Mentré F; Gaynor C; Brendel K; Gesson C; Chenel M
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2013 Jan; 52(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 23212609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation for clinical repeated-dose pharmacokinetic trials applying a peak-and-trough sampling design to estimate oral clearance.
    Ishida K; Kayano Y; Taguchi M; Hashimoto Y
    Biol Pharm Bull; 2007 Nov; 30(11):2159-62. PubMed ID: 17978492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of simulation studies for efficient estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Ette EI; Kelman AW; Howie CA; Whiting B
    Ann Pharmacother; 1993 Sep; 27(9):1034-9. PubMed ID: 8117353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental design and efficient parameter estimation in preclinical pharmacokinetic studies.
    Ette EI; Howie CA; Kelman AW; Whiting B
    Pharm Res; 1995 May; 12(5):729-37. PubMed ID: 7479560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the contribution of residual unexplained variability components on bias and imprecision of parameter estimates in population pharmacokinetic mixed-effects modeling.
    Jaber MM; Brundage RC
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2023 Apr; 50(2):123-132. PubMed ID: 36617366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating inestimable standard errors in population pharmacokinetic studies: the bootstrap with Winsorization.
    Ette EI; Onyiah LC
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2002; 27(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 12365204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental design and efficient parameter estimation in population pharmacokinetics.
    al-Banna MK; Kelman AW; Whiting B
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1990 Aug; 18(4):347-60. PubMed ID: 2231324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of animal pharmacokinetic data: performance of the one point per animal design.
    Ette EI; Kelman AW; Howie CA; Whiting B
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1995 Dec; 23(6):551-66. PubMed ID: 8733946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters by orthogonal regression: comparison of four algorithms.
    Tod M; Aouimer A; Petitjean O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2002 Jan; 67(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 11750944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pharmacokinetically based estimation of patient compliance with oral anticancer chemotherapies: in silico evaluation.
    Hénin E; Tod M; Trillet-Lenoir V; Rioufol C; Tranchand B; Girard P
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2009; 48(6):359-69. PubMed ID: 19650675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A note on population pharmacokinetic studies with a single sampling design.
    Narukawa M; Yafune A
    Ther Drug Monit; 2005 Apr; 27(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 15795638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effects of multiple-trough sampling design and algorithm on the estimation of population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters].
    Ling J; Qian LX; Ding JJ; Jiao Z
    Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2014 May; 49(5):686-94. PubMed ID: 25151742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ED, EID, and API criteria for the robust optimization of sampling times in pharmacokinetics.
    Tod M; Rocchisani JM
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1997 Aug; 25(4):515-37. PubMed ID: 9561492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of point and interval estimates in population pharmacokinetics using NONMEM analysis.
    White DB; Walawander CA; Tung Y; Grasela TH
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1991 Feb; 19(1):87-112. PubMed ID: 2023111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.