352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9300758)
1. Modulated beam conformal therapy for head and neck tumors.
Boyer AL; Geis P; Grant W; Carol M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Aug; 39(1):227-36. PubMed ID: 9300758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on physical dose distributions in the treatment of CNS and head and neck neoplasms with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Fiveash JB; Murshed H; Duan J; Hyatt M; Caranto J; Bonner JA; Popple RA
Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1116-9. PubMed ID: 12094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intensity modulation with the "step and shoot" technique using a commercial MLC: a planning study. Multileaf collimator.
Keller-Reichenbecher MA; Bortfeld T; Levegrün S; Stein J; Preiser K; Schlegel W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Dec; 45(5):1315-24. PubMed ID: 10613328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The potential for sparing of parotids and escalation of biologically effective dose with intensity-modulated radiation treatments of head and neck cancers: a treatment design study.
Wu Q; Manning M; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 10656393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Popple RA; Fiveash JB; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3752-9. PubMed ID: 17985620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic MLC leaf sequencing for integrated linear accelerator control systems.
Popple RA; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6039-45. PubMed ID: 22047368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of intensity modulation inverse planning modules of three commercial treatment planning systems applied to head and neck tumour model.
Fogliata A; Bolsi A; Cozzi L
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Jan; 66(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 12559518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A dynamic supraclavicular field-matching technique for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT.
Duan J; Shen S; Spencer SA; Ahmed RS; Popple RA; Ye SJ; Brezovich IA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):959-72. PubMed ID: 15465215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A topographic leaf-sequencing algorithm for delivering intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Desai D; Ramsey CR; Breinig M; Mahan SL
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2751-6. PubMed ID: 16964850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality assurance of serial tomotherapy for head and neck patient treatments.
Low DA; Chao KS; Mutic S; Gerber RL; Perez CA; Purdy JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Oct; 42(3):681-92. PubMed ID: 9806530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potential of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to escalate doses to head-and-neck cancers: what is the maximal dose?
Zhou J; Fei D; Wu Q
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Nov; 57(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 14529771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system.
MacKenzie MA; Lachaine M; Murray B; Fallone BG; Robinson D; Field GC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 11958650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential clinical efficacy of intensity-modulated conformal therapy.
Meeks SL; Buatti JM; Bova FJ; Friedman WA; Mendenhall WM; Zlotecki RA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(2):483-95. PubMed ID: 9457839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cobalt-60 tomotherapy: clinical treatment planning and phantom dose delivery studies.
Dhanesar S; Darko J; Joshi CP; Kerr A; Schreiner LJ
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081710. PubMed ID: 23927307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
