These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9300839)

  • 1. Compomers--a new bracket bonding generation in orthodontics?
    Eberhard H; Hirschfelder U; Sindel J
    J Orofac Orthop; 1997 Feb; 58(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 9300839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
    Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bond strength of compomers to human enamel.
    Tate WH; You C; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 11203832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of nonrinse conditioning solution and a compomer as an alternative method of bonding orthodontic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Laffoon JF; VonWald L; Warren JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Dec; 71(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 11771784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of compomers to human primary and permanent enamel.
    Cehreli ZC; Usmen E
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced bond strengths of compomers using two dentin bonding systems.
    Somphone P; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2002 Oct; 15(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 12537344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded with different light-cured glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study.
    Cacciafesta V; Süssenberger U; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Miethke RR
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Apr; 20(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 9633171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the bond strength to enamel and dentin of two compomers: an in vitro study.
    Cortés O; García C; Pérez L; Bravo LA
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 9559082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD; Bailey DK; Thompson JY; Pietz DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength of brackets cemented with light-cured glass-ionomer cements to contaminated enamel.
    Itoh T; Fukushima T; Inoue Y; Matsuo N; Matsumoto M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 11763927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of Compoglass-F and Dyract-AP compomers in Class V preparations after salivary contamination.
    Evancusky JW; Meiers JC
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10730285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adhesion of a compomer to dental structures.
    Abate PF; Bertacchini SM; Polack MA; Macchi RL
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):509-12. PubMed ID: 9477878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shear bond strength of Dyract compomer material to dentin of primary molars.
    Megid FY; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 9484116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dyes for caries detection influence sound dentin bond strength.
    Demarco FF; Matos AB; Matson E; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):294-8. PubMed ID: 9855851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.