110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9301053)
1. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with a single formant.
Lyzenga J; Horst JW
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1755-67. PubMed ID: 9301053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with two formants.
Lyzenga J; Horst JW
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):2956-66. PubMed ID: 9821340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Center frequency modulation detection for harmonic complexes resembling vowel formants and its interference by off-frequency maskers.
Lyzenga J; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2792-806. PubMed ID: 10335631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationships of intensity discrimination to sensation and loudness levels: dependence on sound frequency.
Ozimek E; Zwislocki JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3304-20. PubMed ID: 8914312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling formant frequency discrimination of female vowels.
Sommers MS; Kewley-Port D
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3770-81. PubMed ID: 8655808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection, direction discrimination, and off-frequency interference of center-frequency modulations and glides for vowel formants.
Lyzenga J; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3042-53. PubMed ID: 15957773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of front vowels: the role of harmonics in the first formant region.
Assmann PF; Nearey TM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):520-34. PubMed ID: 3558970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on formant-frequency discrimination: Measurements and models.
Carney LH; Cameron DA; Kinast KB; Feld CE; Schwarz DM; Leong UC; McDonough JM
Hear Res; 2023 Aug; 435():108788. PubMed ID: 37224720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels.
Kewley-Port D; Watson CS
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):485-96. PubMed ID: 8120259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrimination of formant transition onset frequency: psychoacoustic cues at short, moderate, and long durations.
Porter RJ; Cullen JK; Collins MJ; Jackson DF
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 1939896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fundamental frequency effects on thresholds for vowel formant discrimination.
Kewley-Port D; Li X; Zheng Y; Neel AT
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2462-70. PubMed ID: 8865651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The identification of vowel-like harmonic complexes: effects of component phase, level, and fundamental frequency.
Alcántara JI; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3813-24. PubMed ID: 7790659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
Turner CW; Zwislocki JJ; Filion PR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jul; 86(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 2754103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forward- and backward-masked intensity discrimination measured using forced-choice and adjustment procedures.
Turner CW; Horwitz AR; Souza PE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2121-6. PubMed ID: 7963025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vowel identification based on amplitude modulation.
Moore BC; Alcántara JI
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Apr; 99(4 Pt 1):2332-43. PubMed ID: 8730079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory nerve representation of vowels in background noise.
Sachs MB; Voigt HF; Young ED
J Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 50(1):27-45. PubMed ID: 6875649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Just noticeable differences for intensity and their relation to loudness.
Johnson JH; Turner CW; Zwislocki JJ; Margolis RH
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):983-91. PubMed ID: 8445133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of spectral prominence on perceived vowel quality.
Beddor PS; Hawkins S
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2684-704. PubMed ID: 2373803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
