205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9302137)
1. One core positive prostate biopsy is a poor predictor of cancer volume in the radical prostatectomy specimen.
Wang X; Brannigan RE; Rademaker AW; McVary KT; Oyasu R
J Urol; 1997 Oct; 158(4):1431-5. PubMed ID: 9302137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis.
Cupp MR; Bostwick DG; Myers RP; Oesterling JE
J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1543-8. PubMed ID: 7714976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease.
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 15828954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Wu Y; Chen MH; Nash M; Renshaw AA; Richie JP
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 11125380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading.
Dong F; Jones JS; Stephenson AJ; Magi-Galluzzi C; Reuther AM; Klein EA
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):896-900; discussion 900. PubMed ID: 18207180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade cancer.
Gofrit ON; Zorn KC; Taxy JB; Lin S; Zagaja GP; Steinberg GD; Shalhav AL
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1925-8. PubMed ID: 17868725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of minute adenocarcinomas of prostate at radical prostatectomy.
Truskinovsky AM; Sanderson H; Epstein JI
Urology; 2004 Oct; 64(4):733-7. PubMed ID: 15491711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion.
Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Brenner PC; Kooner R; Golovsky D; O'Neill GF; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1884-93. PubMed ID: 12673714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relating biopsy and clinical variables to radical prostatectomy findings: can insignificant and advanced prostate cancer be predicted in a screening population?
Anast JW; Andriole GL; Bismar TA; Yan Y; Humphrey PA
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 15351590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy features to predict "clinically insignificant" prostate cancer.
Loeb S; Roehl KA; Thaxton CS; Catalona WJ
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18436287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management.
Ochiai A; Troncoso P; Chen ME; Lloreta J; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2164-8, discussion 2168. PubMed ID: 16280756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
