BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9302730)

  • 1. Gender differences in blue collar workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Baer LM
    Women Health; 1997; 25(4):69-89. PubMed ID: 9302730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the original and revised structures of the Health Promotion Model in predicting construction workers' use of hearing protection.
    Ronis DL; Hong O; Lusk SL
    Res Nurs Health; 2006 Feb; 29(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 16404731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of "Train-the-Trainer" and expert training modalities for hearing protection use in construction.
    Trabeau M; Neitzel R; Meischke H; Daniell WE; Seixas NS
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Feb; 51(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 18067179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Seixas N
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of use of hearing protection among a representative sample of farmers.
    McCullagh MC; Ronis DL; Lusk SL
    Res Nurs Health; 2010 Dec; 33(6):528-38. PubMed ID: 21053386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health conception and health promotion in blue collar workers. Program planning issues.
    Bagwell MM; Bush HA
    AAOHN J; 1999 Nov; 47(11):512-8. PubMed ID: 10865538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test of the health promotion model as a causal model of construction workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Hogan MM
    Res Nurs Health; 1997 Jun; 20(3):183-94. PubMed ID: 9179173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting Thai workers' use of hearing protection.
    Tantranont K; Srisuphan W; Kaewthummanukul T; Suthakorn W; Jormsri P; Salazar MK
    AAOHN J; 2009 Nov; 57(11):455-63. PubMed ID: 19873942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and pilot test of hearing conservation training for construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Meischke H; Daniell WE; Trabeau M; Somers S; Seixas NS
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Feb; 51(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 18067178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation by industrial workers of passive and level-dependent hearing protection devices.
    Tufts JB; Hamilton MA; Ucci AJ; Rubas J
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(50):26-36. PubMed ID: 21173484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of hearing protection use among workers: implications for training programs.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kerr MJ
    Hum Factors; 1995 Sep; 37(3):635-40. PubMed ID: 8566999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.
    McCullagh MC; Banerjee T; Yang JJ; Bernick J; Duffy S; Redman R
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):368-375. PubMed ID: 27991469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test of the Health Promotion Model as a causal model of workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kerr MJ; Atwood JR
    Nurs Res; 1994; 43(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 8183656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Explaining Mexican American workers' hearing protection use with the health promotion model.
    Kerr MJ; Lusk SL; Ronis DL
    Nurs Res; 2002; 51(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 11984380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exposure to hazardous workplace noise and use of hearing protection devices among US workers--NHANES, 1999-2004.
    Tak S; Davis RR; Calvert GM
    Am J Ind Med; 2009 May; 52(5):358-71. PubMed ID: 19267354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender differences and tuberculosis in the Syrian Arab Republic: patients' attitudes, compliance and outcomes.
    Bashour H; Mamaree F
    East Mediterr Health J; 2003 Jul; 9(4):757-68. PubMed ID: 15748072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using the extended parallel process model to prevent noise-induced hearing loss among coal miners in Appalachia.
    Murray-Johnson L; Witte K; Patel D; Orrego V; Zuckerman C; Maxfield AM; Thimons ED
    Health Educ Behav; 2004 Dec; 31(6):741-55. PubMed ID: 15539545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women.
    Grady WR; Klepinger DH; Nelson-Wally A
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(4):168-75. PubMed ID: 10435215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applying the health promotion model to development of a worksite intervention.
    Lusk SL; Kerr MJ; Ronis DL; Eakin BL
    Am J Health Promot; 1999; 13(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 10351852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of hearing protection and perceptions of noise exposure and hearing loss among construction workers.
    Lusk SL; Kerr MJ; Kauffman SA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Jul; 59(7):466-70. PubMed ID: 9697294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.