These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9302891)

  • 21. An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Davis KG; Jorgensen MJ; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2000 Feb; 43(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 10675055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An isometric predictor for maximum acceptable weight of lift for Chinese men.
    Lee YH; Chen YL
    Hum Factors; 1996 Dec; 38(4):646-53. PubMed ID: 8976627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determining Changes in Electromyography Indices when Measuring Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift in Iranian Male Students.
    Salehi Sahl Abadi A; Mazloumi A; Nasl Saraji G; Zeraati H; Hadian MR; Jafari AH
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2018 Mar; 8(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 29732342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Psychophysical acceptability and perception of load heaviness by females.
    Karwowski W
    Ergonomics; 1991 Apr; 34(4):487-96. PubMed ID: 1860464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of background music on maximum acceptable weight of manual lifting tasks.
    Yu R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014; 20(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 25189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.
    Lee K; Waikar A; Aghazadeh F
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1990 Jun; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 2092069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA
    Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):1013-31. PubMed ID: 1387078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction accuracy in estimating joint angle trajectories using a video posture coding method for sagittal lifting tasks.
    Chang CC; McGorry RW; Lin JH; Xu X; Hsiang SM
    Ergonomics; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1039-47. PubMed ID: 20658398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses to continuous box lifting and lowering in nonimpaired subjects.
    Chaloupka EC; Kang J; Mastrangelo MA; Scibilia G; Leder GM; Angelucci J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2000 May; 30(5):249-57; discussion 258-62. PubMed ID: 10817412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Maximum weights of asymmetrical loads acceptable to industrial workers for symmetrical manual lifting.
    Mital A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jun; 48(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 3618467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changes in Back Compressive Force When Measuring Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift in Iranian Male Students.
    Salehi Sahl Abadi A; Nasl Saraji G; Mazloumi A; Zeraati H; Hadian MR; Jafari AH
    Iran J Public Health; 2016 Sep; 45(9):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 27957465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for asymmetric lifting.
    Cheng TS; Lee TH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Jun; 96(3 Pt 2):1339-46. PubMed ID: 12929792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Psychophysical lifting capacity over extended periods.
    Fernandez JE; Ayoub MM; Smith JL
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2009847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight.
    Allread WG; Marras WS; Parnianpour M
    Ergonomics; 1996 Feb; 39(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 8851536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. NIOSH equation horizontal distances associated with the Liberty Mutual (Snook) lifting table box widths.
    Potvin JR; Bent LR
    Ergonomics; 1997 Jun; 40(6):650-5. PubMed ID: 9174416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lumbosacral compression in maximal lifting efforts in sagittal plane with varying mechanical disadvantage in isometric and isokinetic modes.
    Kumar S
    Ergonomics; 1994 Dec; 37(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 7828579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of container design and stair climbing on maximal acceptable lift weight, wrist posture, psychophysical, and physiological responses in wafer-handling tasks.
    Chung HC; Wang MJ
    Appl Ergon; 2001 Dec; 32(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 11703045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.