BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9303369)

  • 1. Data quality in population-based cancer registration: an assessment of the Merseyside and Cheshire Cancer Registry.
    Seddon DJ; Williams EM
    Br J Cancer; 1997; 76(5):667-74. PubMed ID: 9303369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why are a quarter of all cancer deaths in south-east England registered by death certificate only? Factors related to death certificate only registrations in the Thames Cancer Registry between 1987 and 1989.
    Pollock AM; Vickers N
    Br J Cancer; 1995 Mar; 71(3):637-41. PubMed ID: 7880750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why did treatment rates for colorectal cancer in south east England fall between 1982 and 1988? The effect of case ascertainment and registration bias.
    Pollock AM; Benster R; Vickers N
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8639341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Report of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in China, 2014].
    Chen WQ; Li H; Sun KX; Zheng RS; Zhang SW; Zeng HM; Zou XN; Gu XY; He J
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jan; 40(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 29365411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact on colorectal cancer survival of cases registered by 'death certificate only': implications for national survival rates.
    Pollock AM; Vickers N
    Br J Cancer; 1994 Dec; 70(6):1229-31. PubMed ID: 7981082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What lessons can be learned for cancer registration quality assurance from data users? Skin cancer as an example.
    Maudsley G; Williams EM
    Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Oct; 28(5):809-15. PubMed ID: 10597975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Index for evaluating completeness of registration in population-based cancer registries and estimation of registration rate at the Osaka Cancer Registry between 1966 and 1992 using this index].
    Ajiki W; Tsukuma H; Oshima A
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1998 Oct; 45(10):1011-7. PubMed ID: 9893469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.
    ; Busco S; Buzzoni C; Mallone S; Trama A; Castaing M; Bella F; Amodio R; Bizzoco S; Cassetti T; Cirilli C; Cusimano R; De Angelis R; Fusco M; Gatta G; Gennaro V; Giacomin A; Giorgi Rossi P; Mangone L; Mannino S; Rossi S; Pierannunzio D; Tavilla A; Tognazzo S; Tumino R; Vicentini M; Vitale MF; Crocetti E; Dal Maso L
    Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. PubMed ID: 26951748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Completeness of case ascertainment in a Scottish regional cancer registry for the year 1992.
    Brewster DH; Crichton J; Harvey JC; Dawson G
    Public Health; 1997 Sep; 111(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 9308385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Incidence and mortality of cancers appeared in the Hebei provincial cancer registry system in 2011].
    He Y; Liang D; Li D; Zhai J; Liu B; Zhu J; Shan B
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Aug; 36(8):846-51. PubMed ID: 26714541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of data of the Thames cancer registry on 673 cases of colorectal cancer: effect of the registration process.
    Pollock AM; Vickers N
    Qual Health Care; 1995 Sep; 4(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 10153427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing DCO registrations through electronic matching of cancer registry data and routine hospital data.
    Pollock AM; Vickers N
    Br J Cancer; 2000 Feb; 82(3):712-7. PubMed ID: 10682687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proportion of Death Certificate Only Cases and Its Related Factors, Kwangju Cancer Registry (KCR).
    Lee SJ; Shin MH; Kim SY; Park KS; Kim YJ; Hwang TJ; Choi JS
    Cancer Res Treat; 2001 Dec; 33(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 26680831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation, precision and validity of 1-year survival estimates for lung, breast, colon and prostate cancer in South East England primary care trusts.
    Lake J; Mak V; Møller H; Davies EA
    Public Health; 2012 Jan; 126(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22153886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does exclusion of cancers registered only from death-certificate information diminish socio-demographic disparities in recorded survival?
    Tervonen HE; Roder D; Morrell S; You H; Currow DC
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 48():70-77. PubMed ID: 28419901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data quality at the Bulgarian National Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.
    Dimitrova N; Parkin DM
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 39(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 25914137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Italian cancer figures, report 2013: Multiple tumours.
    AIRTUM Working Group
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5 Suppl 1):1-152. PubMed ID: 24259384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinants and interpretation of death certificate only proportions in the initial years of newly established cancer registries.
    Brenner H; Jansen L
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 49(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 23084081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limitations of the death certificate only index as a measure of incompleteness of cancer registration.
    Brenner H
    Br J Cancer; 1995 Aug; 72(2):506-10. PubMed ID: 7640240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Childhood cancer registration in New Zealand: A registry collaboration to assess and improve data quality.
    Ballantine KR; Hanna S; Macfarlane S; Bradbeer P; Teague L; Hunter S; Cross S; Skeen J
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 55():104-109. PubMed ID: 29902672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.