These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9304424)
1. Setting standards for effectiveness: a comparison of expert panels and decision analysis. Bernstein SJ; Hofer TP; Meijler AP; Rigter H Int J Qual Health Care; 1997 Aug; 9(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 9304424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Appropriateness of coronary revascularization for patients with chronic stable angina or following an acute myocardial infarction: multinational versus Dutch criteria. Bernstein SJ; Lázaro P; Fitch K; Aguilar MD; Rigter H; Kahan JP Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Apr; 14(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 11954679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of specialty and nationality on panel judgments of the appropriateness of coronary revascularization: a pilot study. Bernstein SJ; Lázaro P; Fitch K; Aguilar MD; Kahan JP Med Care; 2001 May; 39(5):513-20. PubMed ID: 11317099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronary angiography and revascularization: defining procedural indications through formal group processes. The Canadian Revascularization Panel, the Canadian Coronary Angiography Panel. Naylor CD; McGlynn EA; Leape LL; Pinfold SP; Bernstein SJ; Hilborne LH; Park RE; Kahan JP; Brook RH Can J Cardiol; 1994; 10(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 8111670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. European criteria for the appropriateness and necessity of coronary revascularization procedures. Fitch K; Lázaro P; Aguilar MD; Kahan JP; van het Loo M; Bernstein SJ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2000 Oct; 18(4):380-7. PubMed ID: 11024372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the appropriateness of coronary revascularization: the University of Maryland Revascularization Appropriateness Score (RAS) and its comparison to RAND expert panel ratings and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines with regard to assigned appropriateness rating and ability to predict outcome. Ziskind AA; Lauer MA; Bishop G; Vogel RA Clin Cardiol; 1999 Feb; 22(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 10068842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expert panel vs decision-analysis recommendations for postdischarge coronary angiography after myocardial infarction. Kuntz KM; Tsevat J; Weinstein MC; Goldman L JAMA; 1999 Dec; 282(23):2246-51. PubMed ID: 10605977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization. Hemingway H; Crook AM; Feder G; Banerjee S; Dawson JR; Magee P; Philpott S; Sanders J; Wood A; Timmis AD N Engl J Med; 2001 Mar; 344(9):645-54. PubMed ID: 11228280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Waiting for coronary revascularization: a comparison between New York State, The Netherlands and Sweden. Bernstein SJ; Rigter H; Brorsson B; Hilborne LH; Leape LL; Meijler AP; Scholma JK; Nord AS Health Policy; 1997 Oct; 42(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 10173490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Standards for the appropriate use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and aortocoronary surgery]. Lázaro P; Fitch K; Martín Y Rev Esp Cardiol; 1998 Sep; 51(9):689-715. PubMed ID: 9803795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The appropriateness of intention to treat decisions for invasive therapy in coronary artery disease in The Netherlands. Meijler AP; Rigter H; Bernstein SJ; Scholma JK; McDonnell J; Breeman A; Kosecoff JB; Brook RH Heart; 1997 Mar; 77(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9093037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting: the ACRE study. Appropriateness of Coronary Revascularisation study. Hemingway H; Crook AM; Dawson JR; Edelman J; Edmondson S; Feder G; Kopelman P; Leatham E; Magee P; Parsons L; Timmis AD; Wood A J Public Health Med; 1999 Dec; 21(4):421-9. PubMed ID: 11469365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of variability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms on the appropriateness of use of coronary revascularization procedures. Leape LL; Park RE; Bashore TM; Harrison JK; Davidson CJ; Brook RH Am Heart J; 2000 Jan; 139(1 Pt 1):106-13. PubMed ID: 10618570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Panellist consistency in the assessment of medical appropriateness. McDonnell J; Meijler A; Kahan JP; Bernstein SJ; Rigter H Health Policy; 1996 Sep; 37(3):139-52. PubMed ID: 10160019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The appropriateness of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in academic medical centers. Working Group of the Appropriateness Project of the Academic Medical Center Consortium. Leape LL; Hilborne LH; Schwartz JS; Bates DW; Rubin HR; Slavin P; Park RE; Witter DM; Panzer RJ; Brook RH Ann Intern Med; 1996 Jul; 125(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 8644996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of clinical guideline development using mail-only versus in-person expert panels. Washington DL; Bernstein SJ; Kahan JP; Leape LL; Kamberg CJ; Shekelle PG Med Care; 2003 Dec; 41(12):1374-81. PubMed ID: 14668670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet; 1993 Mar; 341(8845):573-80. PubMed ID: 8094826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of criteria used for detecting underuse of coronary revascularization. Kravitz RL; Laouri M; Kahan JP; Guzy P; Sherman T; Hilborne L; Brook RH JAMA; 1995 Aug 23-30; 274(8):632-8. PubMed ID: 7637144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Appropriateness of referral of coronary angiography patients in Sweden. SECOR/SBU Project Group. Bernstein SJ; Brorsson B; Aberg T; Emanuelsson H; Brook RH; Werkö L Heart; 1999 May; 81(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 10212163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]