These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9305199)

  • 1. Technical and economic feasibility of reusing disposable perfusion cannulas.
    Bloom DF; Cornhill JF; Malchesky PS; Richardson DM; Bolsen KA; Haire DM; Loop FD; Cosgrove DM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1997 Sep; 114(3):448-60. PubMed ID: 9305199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical and economic feasibility of reusing disposable perfusion cannulae.
    Bloom DF; Cornhill JF; Malchesky PS; Richardson DM; Bolsen KA; Haire DM; Loop FD; Cosgrove DM
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(3):248-9. PubMed ID: 9181243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of integrity and sterilization of single-use argon beam plasma coagulation probes.
    Roach SK; Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Sumida SE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Jan; 94(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 9934744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial experience with reuse of coronary angioplasty catheters in the United States.
    Browne KF; Maldonado R; Telatnik M; Vlietstra RE; Brenner AS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Dec; 30(7):1735-40. PubMed ID: 9385901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cost-effectiveness evaluation of laparoscopic disposable versus nondisposable infraumbilical cannulas.
    Ransom SB; McNeeley SG; White C; Diamond MP
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1996 Nov; 4(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 9050707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic analysis of reprocessing single-use medical devices: a systematic literature review.
    Jacobs P; Polisena J; Hailey D; Lafferty S
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 29(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 18462140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reuse of Single-Use Devices in Endourology: A Review.
    Ghorai RP; Kumar R
    J Endourol; 2024 Jan; 38(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37885229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective study of the repeated use of sterilized papillotomes and retrieval baskets for ERCP: quality and cost analysis.
    Cohen J; Haber GB; Kortan P; Dorais JA; Scheider DM; Cirocco M; Habib J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 Feb; 45(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 9040995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reuse of disposables: is it worth the risk?
    Spanton G
    Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1997 Dec; 15(4):28-30. PubMed ID: 9526311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reuse in sterile sites of single-use medical devices: how common is this in Australia?
    Collignon PJ; Graham E; Dreimanis DE
    Med J Aust; 1996 May; 164(9):533-6. PubMed ID: 8649288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
    Lee RM; Vida F; Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Ball TJ; Patterson DJ; Brandabur JJ; Gluck M; Tomas A; Sumida SE; Irizarry D; Jane C
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Apr; 49(4 Pt 1):477-82. PubMed ID: 10202062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices.
    Malchesky PS; Chamberlain VC; Scott-Conner C; Salis B; Wallace C
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a program model to evaluate the potential for reuse of single-use medical devices: results of a pilot test study.
    Abreu EL; Haire DM; Malchesky PS; Wolf-Bloom DF; Cornhill JF
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2002; 36(6):389-404. PubMed ID: 12491959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Slater M; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Nov; 91(8):670-2. PubMed ID: 19785946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reuse of single-use devices. A program model.
    Reichert M
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1993 Sep; 28(3):697-709. PubMed ID: 8367334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reuse of medical devices: implications for infection control.
    Shuman EK; Chenoweth CE
    Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2012 Mar; 26(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 22284382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reuse of single-use devices.
    Schröer P
    Med Device Technol; 2000 Dec; 11(10):44, 48-53. PubMed ID: 11200156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes.
    Nanta P; Senarat W; Tribuddharat C; Danchaivijitr S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reuse of single-use critical medical devices.
    Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates, Inc
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2009; 32(3):228-9. PubMed ID: 19506444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.