These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9305363)

  • 1. The complex interaction of normal biases in line bisection.
    Kashmere JL; Kirk A
    Neurology; 1997 Sep; 49(3):887-9. PubMed ID: 9305363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A normal bias toward a pictorially defined top in line bisection.
    Toth C; Kirk A
    Can J Neurol Sci; 1996 May; 23(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 8738922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Representational bias does not affect bisection of lines with a pictorially or semantically defined top by patients with left hemispatial neglect.
    Toth C; Kirk A
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Nov; 50(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 12464187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A representational vertical bias.
    Jeerakathil TJ; Kirk A
    Neurology; 1994 Apr; 44(4):703-6. PubMed ID: 8164830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual field influence on radial line bisection.
    Geldmacher DS; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 1994 Sep; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 7986493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual illusion and line bisection: a bias hypothesis revisited.
    Chieffi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 234(6):1451-8. PubMed ID: 26781491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contributions of object- and space-based mechanisms to line bisection errors.
    Post RB; Caufield KJ; Welch RB
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(8):856-64. PubMed ID: 11369408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?
    Drakul A; Bockisch CJ; Tarnutzer AA
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):629-36. PubMed ID: 27226452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Length perception of horizontal and vertical bisected lines.
    Charras P; Lupiáñez J
    Psychol Res; 2010 Mar; 74(2):196-206. PubMed ID: 19452164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stimulus asymmetry on line bisection.
    Chieffi S
    Neurology; 1996 Oct; 47(4):1004-8. PubMed ID: 8857735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Far bias on the radial line bisection task: measuring perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in normal subjects.
    Barrett AM; Crosson JB; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Cortex; 2002 Dec; 38(5):769-78. PubMed ID: 12507045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Influence of Focused and Sustained Spatial Attention on the Allocation of Spatial Attention.
    Lamb DG; Balavage KT; Williamson JB; Knight LA; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Jan; 25(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 30486914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.
    Mennemeier M; Pierce CA; Chatterjee A; Anderson B; Jewell G; Dowler R; Woods AJ; Glenn T; Mark VW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1194-211. PubMed ID: 16197678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of moving background on line bisection performance in the normal elderly versus patients with hemispatial neglect.
    Choi KM; Lee BH; Lee SC; Ku BD; Kim EJ; Suh MK; Jeong Y; Heilman KM; Na DL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 86(7):515-26. PubMed ID: 17581286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a directional cue on line bisection.
    Macdonald-Nethercott EM; Kinnear PR; Venneri A
    Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):325-8. PubMed ID: 10857718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rightward and leftward bisection biases in spatial neglect: two sides of the same coin?
    Savazzi S; Posteraro L; Veronesi G; Mancini F
    Brain; 2007 Aug; 130(Pt 8):2070-84. PubMed ID: 17584772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pseudoneglect: evidence for both perceptual and attentional factors.
    Porac C; Searleman A; Karagiannakis K
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Aug; 61(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 16527384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical line quadrisection: "what" it represents and who gets the upper hand.
    Falchook AD; Mody MD; Srivastava AB; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Lang; 2013 Nov; 127(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 23260995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual biases in the horizontal and vertical dimensions are driven by separate cognitive mechanisms.
    Churches O; Loetscher T; Thomas NA; Nicholls ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):444-460. PubMed ID: 26880348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.