These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9305363)

  • 21. Line bisection performances of 650 normal children.
    van Vugt P; Fransen I; Creten W; Paquier P
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(6):886-95. PubMed ID: 10689062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vertical and bisection bias in active touch.
    Millar S; al-Attar Z
    Perception; 2000; 29(4):481-500. PubMed ID: 10953766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attentional bias in the radial and vertical dimensions of space.
    Chieffi S; Castaldi C; Di Maio G; La Marra M; Messina A; Monda V; Villano I
    C R Biol; 2019; 342(3-4):97-100. PubMed ID: 31036514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
    Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Representational neglect for words as revealed by bisection tasks.
    Arduino LS; Marinelli CV; Pasotti F; Ferrè ER; Bottini G
    J Neuropsychol; 2012 Mar; 6(1):43-64. PubMed ID: 22257574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers.
    Fink GR; Marshall JC; Weiss PH; Zilles K
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 2):S59-67. PubMed ID: 11373134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional bias in normal subjects performing visual and tactile radial line bisections.
    Chewning J; Adair JC; Heilman EB; Heilman KM
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Nov; 36(11):1097-101. PubMed ID: 9842756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spatial biases in number line bisection tasks are due to a cognitive illusion of length.
    Stöttinger E; Anderson B; Danckert J; Frühholz B; Wood G
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 220(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 22623099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Line versus representational bisections in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Seki K; Izawa M
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 Dec; 69(6):745-50. PubMed ID: 11080226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radial bisection of words and lines in right-brain-damaged patients with spatial neglect.
    Veronelli L; Arduino LS; Girelli L; Vallar G
    J Neuropsychol; 2017 Sep; 11(3):396-413. PubMed ID: 26611497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual search pattern during the line quadrisection task in normal subjects.
    Lee BH; Jeong Y; Kang SJ; Baek MJ; Chin J; Adair JC; Na DL
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 156(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 14985896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Line bisection and rebisection: the crossover effect of space location.
    Wang Q; Sonoda S; Hanamura M; Okazaki H; Saitoh E
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2005 Jun; 19(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 15883353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Eye movement and online bisection task in unilateral patients with neglect: a new look to the 'gradient effect'.
    Balconi M; Amenta S; Sozzi M; Cannatà AP; Pisani L
    Brain Inj; 2013; 27(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 23438350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of center of mass effect on the distribution of spatial attention in the vertical and horizontal dimensions.
    Shuren JE; Jacobs DH; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 9220092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of illusory spatial anisometry in unilateral neglect.
    Ricci R; Pia L; Gindri P
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jan; 154(2):226-37. PubMed ID: 14557915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Peripersonal and vertical neglect.
    Shelton PA; Bowers D; Heilman KM
    Brain; 1990 Feb; 113 ( Pt 1)():191-205. PubMed ID: 2302532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
    Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hemispheric Asymmetries in Radial Line Bisection: Role of Retinotopic and Spatiotopic Factors.
    Chieffi S; Messina G; Villano I; Messina A; Ilardi CR; Monda M; Salerno M; Sessa F; Mollica MP; Cavaliere G; Trinchese G; Cimmino F; Murabito P; Catapano A; Monda V
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2200. PubMed ID: 30483201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.