These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9305381)
1. PAPNET. The human and other dimensions. Husain OA; Kocjan G; Butler EB; McGloin JE Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(5):1439-44. PubMed ID: 9305381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review. Mitchell H; Medley G Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Observer variation in cytologic grading for cervical dysplasia of Papanicolaou smears with the PAPNET testing system. Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; van den Tweel JG Cancer; 1999 Aug; 87(4):178-83. PubMed ID: 10455204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Computer-assisted rescreening of cervicovaginal smears stained by the Papanicolaou method. Evaluation of the PAPNET system apropos of 225 cases]. Vuong PN; Vacher-Lavenu MC; Marsan C; Baviera E Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1995; 43(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 7574913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of PAPNET--a semiautomated system used in the screening against cervical cancer]. Hølund B; Ejersbo D; Hjortebjerg A Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5802-6. PubMed ID: 9782761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. PRISMATIC Project Management Team. Lancet; 1999 Apr; 353(9162):1381-5. PubMed ID: 10227217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost analysis of PAPNET-assisted vs. conventional Pap smear evaluation in primary screening of cervical smears. Meerding WJ; Doornewaard H; van Ballegooijen M; Bos A; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG; van der Schouw YT; Habbema JD Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11213501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PAPNET testing for HSILs. The few cell/small cell challenge. Solomon HM; Frist S Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 9479348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Costs and outcomes of PAPNET secondary screening technology for cervical cytologic evaluation. A community hospital's experience. Brotzman GL; Kretzchmar S; Ferguson D; Gottlieb M; Stowe C Arch Fam Med; 1999; 8(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 9932072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System. Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of laboratory false negative smears by the PAPNET cytologic screening system. Mitchell H; Medley G Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 9479350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory]. Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A Pathologica; 1998 Aug; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of PAPNET system for rescreening of negative cervical smears. Ashfaq R; Liang Y; Saboorian MH Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Jul; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7587873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy comparison between PAPNET diagnoses and conventional diagnoses in an Italian cervical cytology laboratory. Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Oct; 19(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9784992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. Experience in Greece. Veneti S; Papaefthimiou M; Symiakaki H; Ioannidou-Mouzaka L Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9987447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences between false-negative and true-positive Papanicolaou smears on Papnet-assisted review. Mitchell H; Medley G Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Aug; 19(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 9702494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-assisted primary screening of cervical smears using the PAPNET method: comparison with conventional screening and evaluation of the role of the cytologist. Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Boon ME; Beck S Cytopathology; 1994 Aug; 5(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 7948757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Papnet-assisted cytological diagnosis intensifies the already marked variability among cytological laboratories. Mudu P; Migliore G; Alderisio M; Morosini P; Douglas G; Navone R; Montanari G; Di Bonito L; Vitali A; Moretti D; Giovagnoli MR; Fulciniti F; Branca M; Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 12094957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]