These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9306141)

  • 1. Comparison of QCA systems.
    Dietz U; Rupprecht HJ; Brennecke R; Fritsch HP; Woltmann J; Blankenberg S; Meyer J
    Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Aug; 13(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 9306141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of qualitative stenosis characteristics on the quality of measurements of various QCA systems].
    Dietz U; Rupprecht HJ; Woltmann J; Blankenberg S; Fritsch HP; Brennecke R; Meyer J
    Z Kardiol; 1997 Mar; 86(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 9173708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
    Keane D; Haase J; Slager CJ; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Lehmann KG; Ozaki Y; di Mario C; Kirkeeide R; Serruys PW
    Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Maeng M; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative in-vitro validation of eight first- and second-generation quantitative coronary angiography systems.
    Hausleiter J; Jost S; Nolte CW; Dirschinger J; Kastrati A; Stiel GM; Wunderlich W; Fischer F; Linderer T; Hausmann D; Schömig A
    Coron Artery Dis; 1997 Feb; 8(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 9211047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of quantitative coronary analysis, Assessment of variability due to frame selection, different observers, and different cinefilmless laboratories.
    Sirnes PA; Myreng Y; Mølstad P; Golf S
    Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Sep; 12(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 8915721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo comparison of different quantitative edge detection systems used for measuring coronary arterial diameters.
    Desmet W; De Scheerder I; Beatt K; Huehns T; Piessens J
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1995 Jan; 34(1):72-80; discussion 81. PubMed ID: 7728860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography.
    Dewey M; Rutsch W; Schnapauff D; Teige F; Hamm B
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 17220725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of lumen stenoses with known dimensions by conventional angiography and computed tomography: implications of using conventional angiography as gold standard.
    Arbab-Zadeh A; Texter J; Ostbye KM; Kitagawa K; Brinker J; George RT; Miller JM; Trost JC; Lange RA; Lima JA; Lardo AC
    Heart; 2010 Sep; 96(17):1358-63. PubMed ID: 20801854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of angiographic center and local site analysis of PTCA results in a multicenter angioplasty-restenosis trial. The M Heart Group.
    Martinelli MJ; Deutsch E; Ferraro A; Bove AA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Sep; 27(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 1525816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative coronary arteriography on digital flat-panel system.
    Van Herck PL; Gavit L; Gorissen P; Wuyts FL; Claeys MJ; Bosmans JM; Benali K; Vrints CJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Oct; 63(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 15390252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrepancy in the assessment of jailed side branch lesions by visual estimation and quantitative coronary angiographic analysis: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Shin DH; Koo BK; Waseda K; Park KW; Kim HS; Corral M; Lansky A; Honda Y; Fearon WF; Fitzgerald PJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 78(5):720-6. PubMed ID: 22025472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Boogers MJ; Schuijf JD; Kitslaar PH; van Werkhoven JM; de Graaf FR; Boersma E; van Velzen JE; Dijkstra J; Adame IM; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Schreur JH; Heijenbrok MW; Jukema JW; Reiber JH; Bax JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiolgoy International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase II: the effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography. Joint Photographic Experts Group.
    Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Hekking E; Zwinderman AH; Becker T; Simon R; Reiber JH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 35(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 10758988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance standards and edge detection with computerized quantitative coronary arteriography. The Lovastatin Restenosis Trial Group.
    Klein JL; Boccuzzi SJ; Treasure CB; Manoukian SV; Vogel RA; Beauman GJ; Fischman D; Savage MP; Weintaub WS
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 77(10):815-22. PubMed ID: 8623732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of automated quantitative coronary angiography with caliper measurements of percent diameter stenosis.
    Kalbfleisch SJ; McGillem MJ; Pinto IM; Kavanaugh KM; DeBoe SF; Mancini GB
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 May; 65(18):1181-4. PubMed ID: 2337026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a new UNIX-based quantitative coronary angiographic system for the measurement of coronary artery lesions.
    Bell MR; Britson PJ; Chu A; Holmes DR; Bresnahan JF; Schwartz RS
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Jan; 40(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 8993818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of lossy data compression on quantitative coronary measurements.
    Koning G; Béretta P; Zwart P; Hekking E; Reiber JH
    Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Aug; 13(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 9306140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two and three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
    Kan J; Gao X; Sandeep KG; Xu H; Zhao Y; Chen S; Chen F
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(6):1012-21. PubMed ID: 24622427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography.
    Malagò R; D'Onofrio M; Tavella D; Mantovani W; Brunelli S; Pezzato A; Caliari G; Nicolì L; Benussi P; Mucelli RP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 20861765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.