These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. A deterministic approach to automated stenosis quantification. Tommasini G; Rubartelli P; Piaggio M Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Dec; 48(4):435-45. PubMed ID: 10559828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The need for dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) software algorithms to evaluate bifurcation lesions. Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Ramcharitar S; Tuinenburg JC; Reiber JH; Tu S; Aben JP; Girasis C; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW EuroIntervention; 2015; 11 Suppl V():V44-9. PubMed ID: 25983170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses. Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy and precision of quantitative arteriography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease after coronary bypass surgery. A validation study. Syvänne M; Nieminen MS; Frick MH Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Dec; 10(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 7722345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of a new quantitative coronary angiography analysis system used to evaluate densitometric lumen remodelling. Lièvre M; Finet G; Maupas J Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Feb; 13(1):15-22; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 9080235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. Rigolin VH; Robiolio PA; Spero LA; Harrawood BP; Morris KG; Fortin DF; Baker WA; Bashore TM; Cusma JT Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jul; 78(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 8712131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase II. The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography. Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Hekking E; Zwinderman AH; Becker T; Simon R; Reiber JH Eur Heart J; 2000 Apr; 21(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 10731406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Variability of quantitative coronary angiography: an evaluation of on-site versus core laboratory analysis. Moer R; van Weert AW; Myreng Y; Mølstad P Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2003 Dec; 19(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 14690184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Correlation of pharmacological 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging with poststenotic coronary flow reserve in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenoses. Miller DD; Donohue TJ; Younis LT; Bach RG; Aguirre FV; Wittry MD; Goodgold HM; Chaitman BR; Kern MJ Circulation; 1994 May; 89(5):2150-60. PubMed ID: 8181140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of image enhancement and reconstruction on quantitative coronary arteriography. van der Zwet PM; Reiber JH Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):211-21. PubMed ID: 8596059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of a new system in quantitative coronary arteriography. Svane B; Rasmundson K Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):503-7. PubMed ID: 9240667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials. Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA. Toutouzas K; Chatzizisis YS; Riga M; Giannopoulos A; Antoniadis AP; Tu S; Fujino Y; Mitsouras D; Doulaverakis C; Tsampoulatidis I; Koutkias VG; Bouki K; Li Y; Chouvarda I; Cheimariotis G; Maglaveras N; Kompatsiaris I; Nakamura S; Reiber JH; Rybicki F; Karvounis H; Stefanadis C; Tousoulis D; Giannoglou GD Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of coronary stenosis diameter on variability of on-line quantitative and qualitative arteriography. Lelonek M; Machraoui A Heart Vessels; 1997; Suppl 12():221-3. PubMed ID: 9476588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validity and variability in visual assessment of stenosis severity in phantom bifurcation lesions: a survey in experts during the fifth meeting of the European Bifurcation Club. Girasis C; Onuma Y; Schuurbiers JC; Morel MA; van Es GA; van Geuns RJ; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW; Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb; 79(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 22072537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation of an accurate method for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections. Wellnhofer E; Wahle A; Mugaragu I; Gross J; Oswald H; Fleck E Int J Card Imaging; 1999 Oct; 15(5):339-53; discussion 355-6. PubMed ID: 10595401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard. Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-dimensional reconstruction allows accurate quantification and length measurements of coronary artery stenoses. Rittger H; Schertel B; Schmidt M; Justiz J; Brachmann J; Sinha AM EuroIntervention; 2009 May; 5(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 19577994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Variability in estimation of coronary dimensions from 6F and 8F catheters. Legrand V; Raskinet B; Martinez C; Kulbertus H Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):39-45; discussion 46. PubMed ID: 8770477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]