300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9306396)
21. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
Jayaraman KS
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Off the rails.
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):247. PubMed ID: 18327213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Access issues may determine whether agri-biotech will help the world's poor.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1999 Nov; 402(6760):341-5. PubMed ID: 10586858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Off the rails or on the mark?
Chataway J; Tait J; Wield D
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 May; 26(5):500-1. PubMed ID: 18464777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Off the rails or on the mark?
Heinemann JA
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 May; 26(5):499-500. PubMed ID: 18464776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Chinese agribiotech: Against the grain.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):111-2. PubMed ID: 12634752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
Gurian-Sherman D
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Agbiotech booms in emerging nations.
Lawrence S
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 25(3):271. PubMed ID: 17344870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Plant biotechnology in China.
Huang J; Rozelle S; Pray C; Wang Q
Science; 2002 Jan; 295(5555):674-6. PubMed ID: 11809972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The 20-year African biotech plan.
Singh JA; Daar AS
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):272-4. PubMed ID: 18327231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Auf Wiedersehen, agbiotech.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):974-5. PubMed ID: 18779798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Pollinator-dependent crops: an increasingly risky business.
Winfree R
Curr Biol; 2008 Oct; 18(20):R968-9. PubMed ID: 18957256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Farmer fined for growing GM seed.
Spurgeon D
Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):615. PubMed ID: 11287907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
Smyth S; McHughen A
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Apomixis technology development-virgin births in farmers' fields?
Spillane C; Curtis MD; Grossniklaus U
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):687-91. PubMed ID: 15175691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Trace and traceability--a call for regulatory harmony.
Ramessar K; Capell T; Twyman RM; Quemada H; Christou P
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):975-8. PubMed ID: 18779799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Elements of precaution: recommendations for the regulation of food biotechnology in Canada.
Royal Society of Canada
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2001 Sep; 64(1-2):1-210. PubMed ID: 11592267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Recipe for disaster.
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):465. PubMed ID: 12721554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Agricultural biotechnology in India: prospects and challenges.
Tuli R; Sawant SV; Trivedi PK; Singh PK; Nath P
Biotechnol J; 2009 Mar; 4(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 19253323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer, and then some.
Gelvin SB
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):998-1000. PubMed ID: 18779811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
