These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Are human genes patentable? The Supreme Court says yes and no. Golden JM; Sage WM Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Aug; 32(8):1343-5. PubMed ID: 23918476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biotech patents: the world is your oyster--or mouse--or (you name it). Alix JE Technol Health Care; 1996 Sep; 4(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 8931235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patentable subject matter, TRIPS and the European Biotechnology Directive: Australia and patenting human genes. Palombi L Univ N S W Law J; 2003; 26(3):782-92. PubMed ID: 16617532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomics companies welcome US PTO initiative on DNA patents. Marshall A Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Feb; 15(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 9035129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable. Marshall E Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Nontraditional publications and their effect on patentable inventions. Garabedian TE Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):401-2. PubMed ID: 11923849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patenting DNA: just when you thought it was safe. Chahine KG Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jun; 15(6):586-8. PubMed ID: 9181584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. ESTs stumble at the utility threshold. Davis PK; Kelley JJ; Caltrider SP; Heinig SJ Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Oct; 23(10):1227-9. PubMed ID: 16211059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA patentability--anything but obvious. Dillen JS Wis L Rev; 1997; 5():1023-46. PubMed ID: 16329221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patent border wars: defining the boundary between scientific discoveries and patentable inventions. Holman CM Trends Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):539-43. PubMed ID: 17983675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of "legalese" in biotechnology patents. Chahine K Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Oct; 16(10):971-2. PubMed ID: 9788356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law. Bagley MA William Mary Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 45(2):469-547. PubMed ID: 15570677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic patents: gatekeeper to the promised cures. Westin LP Thomas Jefferson Law Rev; 2002; 25(1):271-99. PubMed ID: 15164741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. HUGO and HGS clash over 'utility' of gene sequences in US patent law. Dickson D Nature; 1995 Apr; 374(6525):751. PubMed ID: 7723817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Japanese guidelines specify the terms of gene patents. Saegusa A Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):731. PubMed ID: 10548087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The scope of utility in the twenty-first century: new guidance for gene-related patents. Summers TM Georgetown Law J; 2003 Jan; 91(2):475-509. PubMed ID: 15046071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Analyzing the USPTO's revised utility guidelines. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Kowalski TJ Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):349-50. PubMed ID: 10700156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]