These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9308634)
1. Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells after the administration of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: an analysis of 497 patients. Weaver CH; Schwartzberg LS; Birch R; Greco FA; Rhinehart S; Hainsworth J; Beeker T; Price H; Geier L; Foster J; West J; Hazelton B; Buckner CD Transfusion; 1997 Sep; 37(9):896-903. PubMed ID: 9308634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Progenitor-cell mobilization after low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: an analysis of progenitor-cell quantity and quality and factors predicting for these parameters in 101 pretreated patients with malignant lymphoma. Watts MJ; Sullivan AM; Jamieson E; Pearce R; Fielding A; Devereux S; Goldstone AH; Linch DC J Clin Oncol; 1997 Feb; 15(2):535-46. PubMed ID: 9053475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF. Koç ON; Gerson SL; Cooper BW; Laughlin M; Meyerson H; Kutteh L; Fox RM; Szekely EM; Tainer N; Lazarus HM J Clin Oncol; 2000 May; 18(9):1824-30. PubMed ID: 10784622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between granulocyte/macrophage-colony-forming units and CD34+ cells in apheresis products from patients treated with different chemotherapy regimens and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells. Vogel W; Kunert C; Blumenstengel K; Fricke HJ; Kath R; Sayer HG; Höffken K J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 1998; 124(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 9692843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Demirer T; Buckner CD; Gooley T; Appelbaum FR; Rowley S; Chauncey T; Lilleby K; Storb R; Bensinger WI Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 Jun; 17(6):937-41. PubMed ID: 8807097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stem cell mobilization in resistant or relapsed lymphoma: superior yield of progenitor cells following a salvage regimen comprising ifosphamide, etoposide and epirubicin compared to intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide. McQuaker IG; Haynes AP; Stainer C; Anderson S; Russell NH Br J Haematol; 1997 Jul; 98(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 9233591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization by chemotherapy with and without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Schwartzberg LS; Birch R; Hazelton B; Tauer KW; Lee P; Altemose R; George C; Blanco R; Wittlin F; Cohen J J Hematother; 1992; 1(4):317-27. PubMed ID: 1285381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cells with high-dose etoposide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with breast cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Hodgkin's disease. Copelan EA; Ceselski SK; Ezzone SA; Lasky LC; Penza SL; Bechtel TP; Klein JL; Hehmeyer DM; Scholl MD; Marshall DD; Elder PJ; Risley GL; Avalos BR J Clin Oncol; 1997 Feb; 15(2):759-65. PubMed ID: 9053502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF]. Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Liu P; Yang JL; Zhou SY; Zhou AP; Zhang CG; Ai B Ai Zheng; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1311-6. PubMed ID: 14693058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with etoposide (VP-16) in patients with relapsed or resistant lymphoma who failed cyclophosphamide mobilization. Reiser M; Josting A; Draube A; Mapara MY; Scheid C; Chemnitz J; Tesch H; Wolf J; Diehl V; Söhngen D; Engert A Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jun; 23(12):1223-8. PubMed ID: 10414907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A dose-finding study of lenograstim (glycosylated rHuG-CSF) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization during postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Lenograstim/Breast Cancer Study Group. Narabayashi M; Takeyama K; Fukutomi T; Tokuda Y; Tajima T; Okumura A; Chou T; Sano M; Makino H; Igarashi T; Sasaki Y; Imoto S; Ogura M; Morishima Y; Murai H; Okamoto S; Ikeda T; Kasai M; Yokozawa T; Tobinai K Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1999 Jun; 29(6):285-90. PubMed ID: 10418556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim. Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive factors for peripheral-blood progenitor-cell collections using a single large-volume leukapheresis after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor mobilization. Passos-Coelho JL; Braine HG; Davis JM; Huelskamp AM; Schepers KG; Ohly K; Clarke B; Wright SK; Noga SJ; Davidson NE J Clin Oncol; 1995 Mar; 13(3):705-14. PubMed ID: 7533827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Matched-pair analysis of hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using G-CSF vs. cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF: enhanced CD34+ cell collections are not necessarily cost-effective. Akard LP; Thompson JM; Dugan MJ; Wiemann M; Greenspan A; Hanks S; Swinney M; Nyhuis A; Jansen J Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 1999; 5(6):379-85. PubMed ID: 10595815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Collection of peripheral blood stem cells following administration of paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and filgrastim in patients with breast and ovarian cancer. Weaver CH; Schwartzberg LS; Birch R; Greco FA; Hainsworth J; Drapkin R; Campos L; Grapski R; Schwerkoske J; Lautersztain J; Hazelton B; Schnell F; Babcock W; Buckner CD Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 1997 Jun; 3(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 9267668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose-intense paclitaxel, etoposide and cyclophosphamide: a safe and active regimen for tumor cytoreduction and stem cell mobilization in metastatic breast cancer. Bilgrami S; Feingold JM; Bona RD; Edwards RL; Khan AM; Rodriguez-Pinero F; Khan IA; Kazierad D; Clive J; Tutschka PJ Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Jan; 25(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10673668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peripheral-blood stem-cell collections after paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with breast and ovarian cancer. Demirer T; Rowley S; Buckner CD; Appelbaum FR; Lilleby K; Storb R; Schiffman K; Bensinger WI J Clin Oncol; 1995 Jul; 13(7):1714-9. PubMed ID: 7541450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A combination of low-dose cyclophosphamide and colony-stimulating factors is more cost-effective than granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors alone in mobilizing peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells. Meisenberg B; Brehm T; Schmeckel A; Miller W; McMillan R Transfusion; 1998 Feb; 38(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 9531956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of normal individuals with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: donor experiences and the effects on peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and on the collection of peripheral blood stem cells. Stroncek DF; Clay ME; Petzoldt ML; Smith J; Jaszcz W; Oldham FB; McCullough J Transfusion; 1996 Jul; 36(7):601-10. PubMed ID: 8701455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial of two doses of cyclophosphamide with etoposide and G-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in 318 patients with stage II-III breast cancer. Schwartzberg LS; Weaver CH; Birch R; Manner C; Tauer K; Beeker T; Morgan-Ihrig C; MacAneny B; Leff R; Smith R; Hainsworth J; Greco T; Schwerkoske J; Murphy MN; Buckner CD J Hematother; 1998 Apr; 7(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 9597571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]