145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9308636)
1. Suitability of preadmission blood samples for pretransfusion testing in elective surgery.
Marosszeky S; McDonald S; Sutherland J; Haysom H; Haeusler M; Sellings C; Metz J; McGrath KM
Transfusion; 1997 Sep; 37(9):910-2. PubMed ID: 9308636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ensuring timely completion of type and screen testing and the verification of ABO/Rh status for elective surgical patients.
Saxena S; Nelson JM; Osby M; Shah M; Kempf R; Shulman IA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Apr; 131(4):576-81. PubMed ID: 17425387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Type and screen completion for scheduled surgical procedures. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 8941 type and screen tests in 108 institutions.
Friedberg RC; Jones BA; Walsh MK;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 May; 127(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 12708894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety of a liberal policy for extended-date preadmission testing samples.
Le N; Harach ME; Gould JM; Herman JH
Transfusion; 2014 Jul; 54(7):1769-72. PubMed ID: 24456011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective study to determine the safety of omitting the antiglobulin crossmatch from pretransfusion testing.
Heddle NM; O'Hoski P; Singer J; McBride JA; Ali MA; Kelton JG
Br J Haematol; 1992 Aug; 81(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 1390245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and cost-containment data that advocate abbreviated pretransfusion testing.
Cordle DG; Strauss RG; Snyder EL; Floss AM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Oct; 94(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 2220670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. North American pretransfusion testing practices, 2001-2004: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program survey data, 2001-2004.
Shulman IA; Maffei LM; Downes KA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 16048410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pretransfusion testing without serologic crossmatch: approaches to ensure patient safety.
Kuriyan M; Fox E
Vox Sang; 2000; 78(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 10765147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revisiting the issue: can the reading for serologic reactivity following 37 degrees C incubation be omitted?
Judd WJ; Fullen DR; Steiner EA; Davenport RD; Knafl PC
Transfusion; 1999 Mar; 39(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 10204593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incomplete pretransfusion testing leads to surgical delays.
McWilliams B; Yazer MH; Cramer J; Triulzi DJ; Waters JH
Transfusion; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2139-44; quiz 2145. PubMed ID: 22348700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evaluation of a positive direct antiglobulin test (autocontrol) in pretransfusion testing revisited.
Judd WJ; Barnes BA; Steiner EA; Oberman HA; Averill DB; Butch SH
Transfusion; 1986; 26(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 3705135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exponential error reduction in pretransfusion testing with automation.
South SF; Casina TS; Li L
Transfusion; 2012 Aug; 52(8):81S-87S. PubMed ID: 22882101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved efficiency in providing blood to surgical patients using a novel approach to preadmission testing.
Jefferies LC; Smith ME; Strobl FJ; Traber KB
Am J Med Qual; 2000; 15(6):251-6. PubMed ID: 11126594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the indirect antiglobulin crossmatch justified?
Peterson DM; Roxby DJ; Seshadri R
Pathology; 1987 Apr; 19(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 3502613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Substitution of the "group-and-screen" for the full crossmatch in elective operations.
Kelton JG; Perrault RA; Blajchman MA
Can Anaesth Soc J; 1983 Nov; 30(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 6640401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of a data driven maximum surgical blood ordering schedule on preoperative blood ordering practices.
Woodrum CL; Wisniewski M; Triulzi DJ; Waters JH; Alarcon LH; Yazer MH
Hematology; 2017 Oct; 22(9):571-577. PubMed ID: 28441911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When should antibody screening tests be done for recently transfused patients?
Shulman IA; Nelson JM; Nakayama R
Transfusion; 1990 Jan; 30(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 2296788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electronic verification of donor-recipient compatibility: the computer crossmatch.
Butch SH; Judd WJ; Steiner EA; Stoe M; Oberman HA
Transfusion; 1994 Feb; 34(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 8310478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pretransfusion compatibility testing for red blood cell administration.
Shulman IA; Downes KA; Sazama K; Maffei LM
Curr Opin Hematol; 2001 Nov; 8(6):397-404. PubMed ID: 11604582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Novel Monoclonal Antibody Therapeutics on Blood Bank Pretransfusion Testing.
Mei Z; Wool GD
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2019 Oct; 33(5):797-811. PubMed ID: 31466605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
