199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9308705)
1. Relationship between the size and margin status of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and residual disease.
Cheng L; Al-Kaisi NK; Gordon NH; Liu AY; Gebrail F; Shenk RR
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Sep; 89(18):1356-60. PubMed ID: 9308705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the volume of ductal carcinoma in situ impact the positive margin rate in patients undergoing breast conservation for invasive breast cancer?
Martin-Dunlap TM; Cyr AE; Al Mushawah F; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 23688789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Neuschatz AC; DiPetrillo T; Steinhoff M; Safaii H; Yunes M; Landa M; Chung M; Cady B; Wazer DE
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(7):1917-24. PubMed ID: 11932892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive value of extent and grade of ductal carcinoma in situ in radiologically guided core biopsy for the status of margins in lumpectomy specimens.
Mai KT; Yazdi HM; Ford JC; Matzinger FR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Nov; 26(7):646-51. PubMed ID: 11078610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Margin width and local recurrence after breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Ekatah GE; Turnbull AK; Arthur LM; Thomas J; Dodds C; Dixon JM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2029-2035. PubMed ID: 28917445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ductal carcinoma in situ. The success of breast conservation therapy: a shared experience of two single institutional nonrandomized prospective studies.
Lagios MD; Silverstein MJ
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1997 Apr; 6(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 9115503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Margin index is not a reliable tool for predicting residual disease after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS.
Fisher CS; Klimberg VS; Khan S; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3155-9. PubMed ID: 21947593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden.
Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Schmid CH; Ruthazer R; Kramer B; Safaii H; Graham R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 May; 38(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 9226315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Dillon MF; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM; Hill AD; O'Higgins N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1618-28. PubMed ID: 17443388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting the likelihood of residual disease in women treated for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Ratanawichitrasin A; Rybicki LA; Steiger E; Grundfest-Broniatowski S; Hermann RE; Crowe JP
J Am Coll Surg; 1999 Jan; 188(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 9915237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should New "No Ink On Tumor" Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines be Applied to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)? A Retrospective Review Using Shaved Cavity Margins.
Merrill AL; Tang R; Plichta JK; Rai U; Coopey SB; McEvoy MP; Hughes KS; Specht MC; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(11):3453-3458. PubMed ID: 27207096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review of third and fourth re-excision for narrow or positive margins of invasive and intraductal carcinoma.
Subhas G; Shah AJ; Gupta A; Cook J; Dubay L; Silapaswan S; Kolachalam R; Kestenberg W; Ferguson L; Jacobs MJ; Goriel Y; Mittal VK
Int Surg; 2011; 96(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 21675615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the relationship between ductal carcinoma in situ, calcifications, and margin status in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.
Bruenderman EH; Bhutiani N; Mercer MK; McMasters KM; Sanders MAG; Ajkay NL
J Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 119(6):694-699. PubMed ID: 30742316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is radiation indicated in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and close or positive mastectomy margins?
Chan LW; Rabban J; Hwang ES; Bevan A; Alvarado M; Ewing C; Esserman L; Fowble B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20646871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor.
Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Ruthazer R; DiPetrillo T; Boyle T; Kanski J; Safaii H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 10571194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis.
Boyages J; Delaney G; Taylor R
Cancer; 1999 Feb; 85(3):616-28. PubMed ID: 10091735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ductal carcinoma in situ treated with lumpectomy and irradiation: histopathological analysis of 49 specimens with emphasis on risk factors and long term results.
Sneige N; McNeese MD; Atkinson EN; Ames FC; Kemp B; Sahin A; Ayala AG
Hum Pathol; 1995 Jun; 26(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 7774895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
