These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9309611)
1. A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI. Part 2: Validation using CT arthrography. Haubner M; Eckstein F; Schnier M; Lösch A; Sittek H; Becker C; Kolem H; Reiser M; Englmeier KH Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(7):805-13. PubMed ID: 9309611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles: measurement with double-contrast multi-detector row CT arthrography versus MR imaging. El-Khoury GY; Alliman KJ; Lundberg HJ; Rudert MJ; Brown TD; Saltzman CL Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):768-73. PubMed ID: 15516604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Three-dimensional thickness and volume measurements of the knee joint cartilage using MRI: validation in an anatomical specimen by CT arthrography]. Schnier M; Eckstein F; Priebsch J; Haubner M; Sittek H; Becker C; Putz R; Englmeier KH; Reiser M Rofo; 1997 Nov; 167(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9440900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-invasive determination of cartilage thickness throughout joint surfaces using magnetic resonance imaging. Eckstein F; Adam C; Sittek H; Becker C; Milz S; Schulte E; Reiser M; Putz R J Biomech; 1997 Mar; 30(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 9119830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging. Eckstein F; Schnier M; Haubner M; Priebsch J; Glaser C; Englmeier KH; Reiser M Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jul; (352):137-48. PubMed ID: 9678042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of 3D dual echo steady state (DESS) MR arthrography to quantify acetabular cartilage thickness. Abraham CL; Bangerter NK; McGavin LS; Peters CL; Drew AJ; Hanrahan CJ; Anderson AE J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Nov; 42(5):1329-38. PubMed ID: 25851109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CORRELATION OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS MADE WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, MAGNETIC RESONANCE ARTHROGRAPHY, AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ARTHROGRAPHY WITH GROSS ARTICULAR CARTILAGE THICKNESS IN THE EQUINE METACARPOPHALANGEAL JOINT. Porter EG; Winter MD; Sheppard BJ; Berry CR; Hernandez JA Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2016 Sep; 57(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 27478155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI. Part 1: Development of a computational method. Lösch A; Eckstein F; Haubner M; Englmeier KH Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(7):795-804. PubMed ID: 9309610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Relevance of susceptibility-induced geometrical distortion for validity of MRI-based cartilage volume and density measurements of the knee joint]. Schnier M; Priebsch J; Faber S; Haubner M; Glaser C; Englmeier KH; Reiser M; Eckstein F Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998 Sep; 43(9):243-8. PubMed ID: 9785618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three dimensional assessment of knee cartilage in cadavers with high resolution MR-arthrography and MSCT-arthrography. Li J; Zheng ZZ; Li X; Yu JK Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1049-55. PubMed ID: 19409819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. Eckstein F; Westhoff J; Sittek H; Maag KP; Haubner M; Faber S; Englmeier KH; Reiser M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 9490936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of knee joint cartilage thickness using three-dimensional magnetic resonance chondro-crassometry (3D MR-CCM). Eckstein F; Gavazzeni A; Sittek H; Haubner M; Lösch A; Milz S; Englmeier KH; Schulte E; Putz R; Reiser M Magn Reson Med; 1996 Aug; 36(2):256-65. PubMed ID: 8843380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hyaline cartilage thickness in radiographically normal cadaveric hips: comparison of spiral CT arthrographic and macroscopic measurements. Wyler A; Bousson V; Bergot C; Polivka M; Leveque E; Vicaut E; Laredo JD Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):441-9. PubMed ID: 17255415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and arthrography to identify artificially induced cartilage defects of the equine carpal joints. Suarez Sanchez-Andrade J; Richter H; Kuhn K; Bischofberger AS; Kircher PR; Hoey S Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2018 May; 59(3):312-325. PubMed ID: 29455473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images. Piplani MA; Disler DG; McCauley TR; Holmes TJ; Cousins JP Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):855-9. PubMed ID: 8628883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]