192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9309743)
1. Influence of anodal electrode position on transvenous defibrillation efficacy in humans: a prospective randomized comparison.
Markewitz A; Kaulbach H; Mattke S; Müller D; Bernutz C; Hoffmann E; Weinhold C; Steinbeck G; Reichart B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2193-9. PubMed ID: 9309743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal electrode position for transvenous defibrillation: a prospective randomized study.
Stajduhar KC; Ott GY; Kron J; McAnulty JH; Oliver RP; Reynolds BT; Adler SW; Halperin BD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 8522716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode.
Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The left subclavian vein as an alternative site for implantation of the second defibrillation lead.
Markewitz A; Kaulbach H; Mattke S; Dorwarth U; Hoffmann E; Weinhold C; Steinbeck G; Reichart B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Mar; 18(3 Pt 1):401-5. PubMed ID: 7770359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU
Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvenous biventricular defibrillation.
Meisel E; Butter C; Philippon F; Higgins S; Strickberger SA; Smith J; Hahn S; Michel U; Schubert B; Pfeiffer D
Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):76K-85K. PubMed ID: 11084104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvenous defibrillation leads: is there an ideal position of the defibrillation anode?
Trappe HJ; Pfitzner P; Fain E; Dresler C; Fieguth HG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Apr; 20(4 Pt 1):880-92. PubMed ID: 9127392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal method to achieve consistently low defibrillation energy requirements.
Winter J; Zimmermann N; Lidolt H; Dees H; Perings C; Vester EG; Poll L; Schipke JD; Contzen K; Gams E
Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):71K-75K. PubMed ID: 11084103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bipolar transvenous defibrillation: efficacy of two different positions of the anode.
Block M; Hammel D; Böcker D; Borggrefe M; Budde T; Castrucci M; Fastenrath C; Scheld HH; Breithardt G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 18(11):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 8552512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds.
Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; DeGroot PJ; Cuello C; Shorofsky SR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 10695457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A permanent transvenous lead system for an implantable pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator. Nonthoracotomy approach to implantation.
Yee R; Klein GJ; Leitch JW; Guiraudon GM; Guiraudon CM; Jones DL; Norris C
Circulation; 1992 Jan; 85(1):196-204. PubMed ID: 1728450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems.
Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, randomized evaluation of a nonthoracotomy implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead system. Endotak/PRX Investigator Group.
Baker JH; Epstein AE; Voshage-Stahl L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 1):72-8. PubMed ID: 9121974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of proximal electrode position in transvenous ventricular defibrillation.
Nitta J; Khoury DS
Ann Biomed Eng; 1996; 24(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 8734062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The subcutaneous array: a new lead adjunct for the transvenous ICD to lower defibrillation thresholds.
Higgins SL; Alexander DC; Kuypers CJ; Brewster SA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):1540-8. PubMed ID: 7479175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.
Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A systematic evaluation of conventional and novel transvenous pathways for defibrillation.
Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Dahl RW; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 3(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10490479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Additional lead improves defibrillation efficacy with an abdominal 'hot can' electrode system.
Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey KA; Niebauer MJ; Tchou PJ; Wilkoff BL
Circulation; 1997 Dec; 96(12):4400-7. PubMed ID: 9416910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
