202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9310036)
1. Improved fixation of porous-coated versus grit-blasted surface texture of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in dogs.
Overgaard S; Lind M; Rahbek O; Bünger C; Søballe K
Acta Orthop Scand; 1997 Aug; 68(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 9310036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porous-coated versus grit-blasted surface texture of hydroxyapatite-coated implants during controlled micromotion: mechanical and histomorphometric results.
Overgaard S; Lind M; Glerup H; Bünger C; Søballe K
J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jun; 13(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 9645526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of hydroxyapatite coating in resisting wear particle migration and osteolysis around acetabular components.
Coathup MJ; Blackburn J; Goodship AE; Cunningham JL; Smith T; Blunn GW
Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(19):4161-9. PubMed ID: 15664643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved bone anchorage of hydroxypatite coated implants compared with tricalcium-phosphate coated implants in trabecular bone in dogs.
Lind M; Overgaard S; Bünger C; Søballe K
Biomaterials; 1999 May; 20(9):803-8. PubMed ID: 10226706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Torsional stability of HA-coated and grit-blasted titanium dental implants.
Cook SD; Baffes GC; Palafox AJ; Wolfe MW; Burgess A
J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 1298818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biological fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated versus grit-blasted titanium hip stems: a canine study.
Eckardt A; Aberman HM; Cantwell HD; Heine J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Feb; 123(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12582793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fixation of titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants in arthritic osteopenic bone.
Søballe K; Hansen ES; Brockstedt-Rasmussen H; Hjortdal VE; Juhl GI; Pedersen CM; Hvid I; Bünger C
J Arthroplasty; 1991 Dec; 6(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 1663154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical and histological evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated, titanium-coated and grit-blasted surfaces under weight-bearing conditions.
Dávid A; Eitenmüller J; Muhr G; Pommer A; Bär HF; Ostermann PA; Schildhauer TA
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1995; 114(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 7734232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone compaction enhances fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in a canine gap model.
Kold S; Rahbek O; Zippor B; Bechtold JE; Søballe K
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Oct; 75(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16025476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-delivered Alendronate Causes a Dose-dependent Response on Net Bone Formation Around Porous Titanium Implants in Canines.
Pura JA; Bobyn JD; Tanzer M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May; 474(5):1224-33. PubMed ID: 26831478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interfacial shear strength of bioactive-coated carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone after in vivo implantation.
Nakahara I; Takao M; Goto T; Ohtsuki C; Hibino S; Sugano N
J Orthop Res; 2012 Oct; 30(10):1618-25. PubMed ID: 22467537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of bone remodelling around hydroxyapatite-coated, porous-coated and grit-blasted hip replacements retrieved at post-mortem.
Coathup MJ; Blunn GW; Flynn N; Williams C; Thomas NP
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2001 Jan; 83(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 11245519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical and morphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinity.
Chang YL; Lew D; Park JB; Keller JC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Sep; 57(9):1096-108; discussion 1108-9. PubMed ID: 10484111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants.
Dalton JE; Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 7822360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strontium in the bone-implant interface.
Vestermark MT
Dan Med Bull; 2011 May; 58(5):B4286. PubMed ID: 21535993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transforming growth factor-beta stimulates bone ongrowth. Hydroxyapatite-coated implants studied in dogs.
Lind M; Overgaard S; Nguyen T; Ongpipattanakul B; Bünger C; Søballe K
Acta Orthop Scand; 1996 Dec; 67(6):611-6. PubMed ID: 9065077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydroxyapatite-coating on titanium arc sprayed titanium implants.
Nakashima Y; Hayashi K; Inadome T; Uenoyama K; Hara T; Kanemaru T; Sugioka Y; Noda I
J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Jun; 35(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9138063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem.
Kusakabe H; Sakamaki T; Nihei K; Oyama Y; Yanagimoto S; Ichimiya M; Kimura J; Toyama Y
Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(15):2957-69. PubMed ID: 14967528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite tricalcium-phosphate coatings.
Jinno T; Davy DT; Goldberg VM
J Arthroplasty; 2002 Oct; 17(7):902-9. PubMed ID: 12375251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphometric and mechanical evaluation of titanium implant integration: comparison of five surface structures.
Svehla M; Morberg P; Zicat B; Bruce W; Sonnabend D; Walsh WR
J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Jul; 51(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10813740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
