199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9311982)
41. A dominant-negative MEC3 mutant uncovers new functions for the Rad17 complex and Tel1.
Giannattasio M; Sommariva E; Vercillo R; Lippi-Boncambi F; Liberi G; Foiani M; Plevani P; Muzi-Falconi M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Oct; 99(20):12997-3002. PubMed ID: 12271137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity.
Liberi G; Chiolo I; Pellicioli A; Lopes M; Plevani P; Muzi-Falconi M; Foiani M
EMBO J; 2000 Sep; 19(18):5027-38. PubMed ID: 10990466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A role for the yeast cell cycle/splicing factor Cdc40 in the G1/S transition.
Kaplan Y; Kupiec M
Curr Genet; 2007 Feb; 51(2):123-40. PubMed ID: 17171376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. MEC3, MEC1, and DDC2 are essential components of a telomere checkpoint pathway required for cell cycle arrest during senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Enomoto S; Glowczewski L; Berman J
Mol Biol Cell; 2002 Aug; 13(8):2626-38. PubMed ID: 12181334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Regulation of tolerance to DNA alkylating damage by Dot1 and Rad53 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Conde F; Ontoso D; Acosta I; Gallego-Sánchez A; Bueno A; San-Segundo PA
DNA Repair (Amst); 2010 Oct; 9(10):1038-49. PubMed ID: 20674515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The G2/M DNA damage checkpoint inhibits mitosis through Tyr15 phosphorylation of p34cdc2 in Aspergillus nidulans.
Ye XS; Fincher RR; Tang A; Osmani SA
EMBO J; 1997 Jan; 16(1):182-92. PubMed ID: 9009279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast.
Gardner R; Putnam CW; Weinert T
EMBO J; 1999 Jun; 18(11):3173-85. PubMed ID: 10357828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9.
Wysocki R; Javaheri A; Allard S; Sha F; Côté J; Kron SJ
Mol Cell Biol; 2005 Oct; 25(19):8430-43. PubMed ID: 16166626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Physical and functional interactions between nucleotide excision repair and DNA damage checkpoint.
Giannattasio M; Lazzaro F; Longhese MP; Plevani P; Muzi-Falconi M
EMBO J; 2004 Jan; 23(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 14726955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Expression of UMP1 is inducible by DNA damage and required for resistance of S. cerevisiae cells to UV light.
Mieczkowski P; Dajewski W; Podlaska A; Skoneczna A; Ciesla Z; Sledziewska-Gójska E
Curr Genet; 2000 Aug; 38(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 10975253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Mitotic catastrophe is the mechanism of lethality for mutations that confer mutagen sensitivity in Aspergillus nidulans.
Denison SH; May GS
Mutat Res; 1994 Jan; 304(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 7506362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cell division transforms mutagenic lesions into deletion-recombinagenic lesions in yeast cells.
Galli A; Schiestl RH
Mutat Res; 1999 Aug; 429(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 10434021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Mutant PCNA alleles are associated with cdc phenotypes and sensitivity to DNA damage in fission yeast.
Arroyo MP; Wang TS
Mol Gen Genet; 1998 Mar; 257(5):505-18. PubMed ID: 9563836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Hydroxyurea sensitivity reveals a role for ISC1 in the regulation of G2/M.
Matmati N; Kitagaki H; Montefusco D; Mohanty BK; Hannun YA
J Biol Chem; 2009 Mar; 284(13):8241-6. PubMed ID: 19158081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 genes are required for tolerating irreparable, ultraviolet-induced DNA damage.
Paulovich AG; Armour CD; Hartwell LH
Genetics; 1998 Sep; 150(1):75-93. PubMed ID: 9725831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Regulation of the RAD6 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the mitotic cell cycle and in meiosis.
Kupiec M; Simchen G
Mol Gen Genet; 1986 Jun; 203(3):538-43. PubMed ID: 3528754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The DNA damage checkpoint signal in budding yeast is nuclear limited.
Demeter J; Lee SE; Haber JE; Stearns T
Mol Cell; 2000 Aug; 6(2):487-92. PubMed ID: 10983994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Characterization of DNA damage-stimulated self-interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint protein Rad17p.
Zhang H; Zhu Z; Vidanes G; Mbangkollo D; Liu Y; Siede W
J Biol Chem; 2001 Jul; 276(28):26715-23. PubMed ID: 11356855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast.
Longhese MP; Foiani M; Muzi-Falconi M; Lucchini G; Plevani P
EMBO J; 1998 Oct; 17(19):5525-8. PubMed ID: 9755152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A Slowed Cell Cycle Stabilizes the Budding Yeast Genome.
Vinton PJ; Weinert T
Genetics; 2017 Jun; 206(2):811-828. PubMed ID: 28468908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
