199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9311982)
61. Regulation of cell cycle progression following DNA damage.
Hensey C; Gautier J
Prog Cell Cycle Res; 1995; 1():149-62. PubMed ID: 9552360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Mft1, identified from a genome-wide screen of the yeast haploid mutants, mediates cell cycle arrest to counteract quinoxaline-induced toxicity.
Sulaiman AA; Al-Ansari DE; Ali R; Aouida M; Ramotar D
Front Genet; 2023; 14():1296383. PubMed ID: 38283148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Mapping DNA damage-dependent genetic interactions in yeast via party mating and barcode fusion genetics.
Díaz-Mejía JJ; Celaj A; Mellor JC; Coté A; Balint A; Ho B; Bansal P; Shaeri F; Gebbia M; Weile J; Verby M; Karkhanina A; Zhang Y; Wong C; Rich J; Prendergast D; Gupta G; Öztürk S; Durocher D; Brown GW; Roth FP
Mol Syst Biol; 2018 May; 14(5):e7985. PubMed ID: 29807908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Hof1 plays a checkpoint-related role in MMS-induced DNA damage response in
Feng J; Islam A; Bean B; Feng J; Sparapani S; Shrivastava M; Goyal A; Omran RP; Mallick J; Whiteway M
Mol Biol Cell; 2020 Mar; 31(5):348-359. PubMed ID: 31940254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The response to the DNA damaging agent methyl methanesulfonate in a fungal plant pathogen.
Milo-Cochavi S; Pareek M; Delulio G; Almog Y; Anand G; Ma LJ; Covo S
Fungal Biol; 2019 May; 123(5):408-422. PubMed ID: 31053330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Pedigree analyses of yeast cells recovering from DNA damage allow assignment of lethal events to individual post-treatment generations.
Klein F; Karwan A; Wintersberger U
Genetics; 1990 Jan; 124(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 2407605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. The effect of a DNA damaging agent on embryonic cell cycles of the cnidarian Hydractinia echinata.
Su TT
PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11760. PubMed ID: 20668699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Methods to induce cell cycle checkpoints.
Lieberman HB; Hopkins KM
Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 241():3-10. PubMed ID: 14970641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. A(TR) checkpoint for S/G2 transition.
Trenkmann M
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):676-677. PubMed ID: 30224670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Controlled chaos: new insights into genetically programmed cell cycle asynchrony.
Umen J
Cell Cycle; 2010 Oct; 9(19):3843-4. PubMed ID: 20948281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. The DNA damage checkpoint: A tale from budding yeast.
Pizzul P; Casari E; Gnugnoli M; Rinaldi C; Corallo F; Longhese MP
Front Genet; 2022; 13():995163. PubMed ID: 36186482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Conditional genome engineering reveals canonical and divergent roles for the Hus1 component of the 9-1-1 complex in the maintenance of the plastic genome of Leishmania.
Damasceno JD; Obonaga R; Silva GLA; Reis-Cunha JL; Duncan SM; Bartholomeu DC; Mottram JC; McCulloch R; Tosi LRO
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Dec; 46(22):11835-11846. PubMed ID: 30380080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Chimeric proteins tagged with specific 3xHA cassettes may present instability and functional problems.
Saiz-Baggetto S; Méndez E; Quilis I; Igual JC; Bañó MC
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183067. PubMed ID: 28800621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. S-phase checkpoint regulations that preserve replication and chromosome integrity upon dNTP depletion.
Giannattasio M; Branzei D
Cell Mol Life Sci; 2017 Jul; 74(13):2361-2380. PubMed ID: 28220209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Mutations in the Non-Catalytic Subunit Dpb2 of DNA Polymerase Epsilon Affect the Nrm1 Branch of the DNA Replication Checkpoint.
Dmowski M; Rudzka J; Campbell JL; Jonczyk P; Fijałkowska IJ
PLoS Genet; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1006572. PubMed ID: 28107343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Orderly progression through S-phase requires dynamic ubiquitylation and deubiquitylation of PCNA.
Álvarez V; Viñas L; Gallego-Sánchez A; Andrés S; Sacristán MP; Bueno A
Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25513. PubMed ID: 27151298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Yet another job for Dna2: Checkpoint activation.
Wanrooij PH; Burgers PM
DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 Aug; 32():17-23. PubMed ID: 25956863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Preserving Yeast Genetic Heritage through DNA Damage Checkpoint Regulation and Telomere Maintenance.
Baldo V; Liang J; Wang G; Zhou H
Biomolecules; 2012 Oct; 2(4):505-23. PubMed ID: 24970147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Ddc2 mediates Mec1 activation through a Ddc1- or Dpb11-independent mechanism.
Bandhu A; Kang J; Fukunaga K; Goto G; Sugimoto K
PLoS Genet; 2014 Feb; 10(2):e1004136. PubMed ID: 24586187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A Rad53 independent function of Rad9 becomes crucial for genome maintenance in the absence of the Recq helicase Sgs1.
Nielsen I; Bentsen IB; Andersen AH; Gasser SM; Bjergbaek L
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81015. PubMed ID: 24278365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
