BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9312820)

  • 1. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
    Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cytobrush quality assurance in endocervical smears].
    Kerl J; Ross A; Hilgarth M
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Jan; 51(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 2026300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM; Javaheri G
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervex brush versus vaginal-cervical-endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling.
    Järvi K
    Cytopathology; 1997 Aug; 8(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 9252746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Acceptable quality cervical cytology taking: comparison of Cervex-brush and Cervex-mex methods].
    Ojeda Ortiz J; Muñoz Molina R; Pardo López M; Guevara Cruz M; Hernández Quijano T; Valencia Elizondo C; Hernández Valencia M
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2008 Jul; 76(7):381-5. PubMed ID: 18798438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
    Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal sampling devices for liquid-based procedure in screening for cervical cancer: comparison between cotton stick/Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush.
    Kuramoto H; Banno M; Hori M; Miyagawa J; Iida M; Kawaguchi M
    Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 23406881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM; Blythe JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The use of the cervix brush for early diagnosis of cervix uteri cancer: quality of the smear].
    Weyler J; Engels H
    Arch Belg; 1989; 47(1-4):81-4. PubMed ID: 2610580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved endocervical sampling and HPV viral load detection by Cervex-Brush Combi.
    Depuydt CE; Benoy IH; Bailleul EJ; Vandepitte J; Vereecken AJ; Bogers JJ
    Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 17168921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphometric analysis of dysplasia in cervical cone biopsy specimens in cases with false-negative cytology.
    Hartman B; Kaplan B; Boone D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Dec; 68(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 3785796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
    Rivlin ME; Woodliff JM; Bowlin RB; Moore JL; Martin RW; Grossman JH; Morrison JC
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
    Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Results of 2-year cyclic studies on the prevention of precancerous conditions and cancer of the cervix uteri].
    Grys E
    Ginekol Pol; 1987 Sep; 58(9):582-8. PubMed ID: 3443355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.